Reasons for using indoor tanning devices: A systematic review of qualitative evidence.

Martin Eden, Stephanie Lyons, Paul Lorigan, Katherine Payne, Adele C Green, Tracy Epton

Journal: British journal of health psychology 2023;28(1):22-46

PMID: 35808920

Abstract

PURPOSE

Despite the established causal links to skin cancer, skin ageing and eye inflammation, people continue to use indoor tanning devices (hereafter 'sunbeds'). Understanding the reasons underlying the use of sunbeds is essential for developing effective interventions. The purpose of this study was to collate all existing evidence from qualitative papers published to date that had assessed motivations for using sunbeds.

METHODS

Six databases were searched from inception to February 2020 for qualitative studies that explored adults' experiences of using sunbeds. Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria, and a narrative evidence synthesis was used to collate findings from each primary study.

RESULTS

Users of sunbeds were motivated primarily by aesthetic concerns but also by perceived psychological benefits (well-being, confidence and 'fitting in') and physical benefits (improvement in skin conditions such as acne, acquiring vitamin D and preventing sunburn). People also chose indoor tanning over alternatives such as fake tans because they considered the alternatives unacceptable and did not consider indoor tanning a serious health risk. To date, no studies have explored alternatives to meeting non-aesthetic needs related to the use of sunbeds.

CONCLUSIONS

This comprehensive explanation for the practice of indoor tanning provides the basis for development of complex interventions to reduce the harm caused by using sunbeds. Effective interventions should include promotion of alternatives, such as different methods of relaxing, to satisfy underlying motivations, changing social norms and correcting misperceptions about health benefits.

© 2022 The Authors. British Journal of Health Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society.

Address: Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.; Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.; Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.; Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.