Eicosapentaenoic Acid for Cardiovascular Events Reduction- Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Yujiro Yokoyama, Toshiki Kuno, Sae X Morita, Leandro Slipczuk, Hisato Takagi, Alexandros Briasoulis, Azeem Latib, Sripal Bangalore, Sean P Heffron

Journal: Journal of cardiology 2022;80(5):416-422

PMID: 35914996

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) investigating the impact of omega-3-fatty acid supplementation on cardiovascular events have largely shown no benefit. However, there is debate about the benign nature of the placebo in these trials. We aimed to conduct a network meta-analysis of RCTs to compare the outcomes of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation to various placebo oils.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched through May, 2021 to identify RCTs investigating cardiovascular outcomes with omega-3-fatty acid formulations [eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), decosahexanoic acid (DHA), or the combination] versus placebo or standard of care controls.

RESULTS

Our analysis included 17 RCTs that enrolled a total of 141,009 patients randomized to EPA (n=13,655), EPA+DHA (n=56,908), mineral oil placebo (n=5,338), corn oil placebo (n =8,876), olive oil placebo (n=41,009), and controls (no placebo oil; n=15,223). Rates of cardiovascular death [hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval, CI) =0.80 (0.65-0.98); p =0.033], myocardial infarction [HR (95% CI) =0.73 (0.55-0.97); p=0.029] and stroke [HR (95% CI) =0.74 (0.58-0.94); p=0.014] were significantly lower in those receiving EPA compared to those receiving mineral oil, but were not different from rates in those receiving other oils or controls. Rates of coronary revascularization were significantly lower in those receiving EPA than in those receiving either EPA+DHA, mineral oil, corn oil, or olive oil placebo, but not controls. All-cause death was similar among all groups, but combined EPA+DHA was associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular death compared to controls [HR (95%CI): 0.83 (0.71-0.98)].

CONCLUSIONS

Our analyses demonstrate that although EPA supplementation lowers risk of coronary revascularization more than other oils, there may not be a benefit relative to standard of care. Further, EPA reduces the risk of cardiovascular events only in comparison to mineral oil and not when compared with other placebo oils or controls. In contrast, combined EPA+DHA was associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular death compared to controls.

Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Address: Department of Surgery, St. Luke's University Health Network, Bethlehem, PA, USA.; Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York, NY, USA; Division of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: [email protected].; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.; Division of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shizuoka, Medical Center, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, Japan.; Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA.; Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.; Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; NYU Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, New York Langone Health, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: [email protected].
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.