SARS-CoV-2 air sampling: A systematic review on the methodologies for detection and infectivity.

Priscilla G Silva, Pedro T B S Branco, Ruben R G Soares, João R Mesquita, Sofia I V Sousa

Journal: Indoor air 2022;32(8):e13083

PMID: 36040285

Abstract

This systematic review aims to present an overview of the current aerosol sampling methods (and equipment) being used to investigate the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in the air, along with the main parameters reported in the studies that are essential to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of each method and perspectives for future research regarding this mode of transmission. A systematic literature review was performed on PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus to assess the current air sampling methodologies being applied to SARS-CoV-2. Most of the studies took place in indoor environments and healthcare settings and included air and environmental sampling. The collection mechanisms used were impinger, cyclone, impactor, filters, water-based condensation, and passive sampling. Most of the reviewed studies used RT-PCR to test the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the collected samples. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected with all collection mechanisms. From the studies detecting the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA, fourteen assessed infectivity. Five studies detected viable viruses using impactor, water-based condensation, and cyclone collection mechanisms. There is a need for a standardized protocol for sampling SARS-CoV-2 in air, which should also account for other influencing parameters, including air exchange ratio in the room sampled, relative humidity, temperature, and lighting conditions.

© 2022 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Address: Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health (ITR), Porto, Portugal.; School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences (ICBAS), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.; LEPABE - Laboratory for Process Engineering, Environment, Biotechnology and Energy, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.; ALiCE - Associate Laboratory in Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.; Epidemiology Research Unit (EPI Unit), Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.; Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm University, Solna, Sweden.; Division of Nanobiotechnology, Department of Protein Science, Science for Life Laboratory, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Solna, Sweden.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.