Video Consent for Colonoscopy Improves Knowledge Retention and Patient Satisfaction: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Ruthvik Padival, Kevin B Harris, Ari Garber, Faris El-Khider, Adam Kichler, John Vargo, Brian B Baggott

Journal: Journal of clinical gastroenterology 2022;56(5):433-437

PMID: 34319948

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Informed consent for endoscopy is variable across institutions and remains understudied in gastrointestinal endoscopy. This study aims to standardize informed consent for screening and diagnostic colonoscopies with a supplemental video tool that includes the key components of informed consent.

METHODS

A video tool was developed that incorporated the key components of informed consent for colonoscopy. In addition, a 7-question survey was developed to query patients on core aspects of informed consent and satisfaction with the informed consent process. Patients undergoing elective outpatient colonoscopy with conscious sedation were randomized to traditional consent or consent with the addition of a video tool. A pilot study determined the sample size. Traditional consent was standard of practice before the procedure. Patients in the video tool group watched the video tool in the preprocedure area followed by traditional consent. Both groups had the opportunity to address questions with the attending physician before the procedure. All patients were contacted 1 to 2 days following the colonoscopy to answer the question survey.

RESULTS

A total of 110 patients were eligible for participation, and 91 were included in the final data analysis. Subjects in the video tool group demonstrated significantly higher recall of key aspects of informed consent and higher satisfaction with the informed consent process versus the traditional consent group. The history of prior colonoscopy was similar between both groups. Mean endoscopy operation metrics were not negatively impacted by the inclusion of the video tool.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing screening and diagnostic colonoscopies who received informed consent supplemented by a video tool had a higher recall of core aspects of informed consent and higher satisfaction with the process, with no impact on procedural times.

Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Address: Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Digestive Diseases and Surgery Institute.; Department of Internal Medicine, Community Care Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.