Growth and productivity assessments of peanut under different irrigation water management practices using CSM-CROPGRO-Peanut model in Eastern Mediterranean of Turkey.

Semih Metin Sezen, Ishfaq Ahmad, Muhammad Habib-Ur-Rahman, Ebrahim Amiri, Servet Tekin, Kadir Can Oz, Clever Mwika Maambo

Journal: Environmental science and pollution research international 2022;29(18):26936-26949

PMID: 34862582

Abstract

Irrigation water scheduling is crucial to make the most efficient use of ever-decreasing water. As excessive irrigation decreases yield, while imprecise application also causes various environmental issues. Therefore, efficient management of irrigation frequency and irrigation level is necessary to sustain productivity under limited water conditions. The objective of the current study is to assess the water productivity at various irrigation regimes during peanut crop growing seasons (2014 and 2015) in Eastern Mediterranean, Turkey. The field experiments were conducted with treatments consisting of three irrigation frequencies (IF) (IF: 25 mm; IF: 50 mm; and IF: 75 mm of cumulative pan evaporation (CPE)), and four irrigation water levels (WL = 0.50, WL = 0.75, WL = 1.0, and WL = 1.25). WL, WL, WL, and WL treatments received 50, 75, 100, and 125 of cumulative pan evaporation. The CSM-CROPGRO-Peanut model was calibrated with experimental data in 2014 and evaluated with second-year experimental data (2015). The model simulated seed yield and final biomass (dry matter) reasonably well with low normalized root mean square error (RMSE) in various irrigation intervals. The model simulated reasonably well for days to anthesis (RMSE = 2.53, d-stat = 0.96, and r = 0.90), days to physiological maturity (RMSE = 2.55), seed yield (RMSE = 1504), and tops biomass dry weight at maturity (RMSE = 3716). Simulation results indicated good agreement between measured and simulated soil water content (SWC) with low RMSE values (4.0 to 16.8% in 2014 and 4.3 to 18.2% in 2015). Further results showed that IFI irrigation regime produced the highest seed yield. Generally, model evaluation performed reasonably well for all studied parameters with both years' experimental data. Results also showed that the crop model would be a precision agriculture tool for the extrapolation of the allocation of irrigation water resources and decision management under current and future climate.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Address: Department of Irrigation and Agricultural Structures, Faculty of Agriculture, Cukurova University, 01330, Adana, Turkey. [email protected].; Resilient Agriculture Department, Asian Disaster Preparedness Center (ADPC), Bangladesh, Pakistan.; Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation (INRES), Crop Science Group, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Katzenburgweg 5, 53115, Bonn, Germany. [email protected].; MNS-University of Agriculture, Multan, Pakistan. [email protected].; Water Engineering Department, Islamic Azad University, Lahijan, Iran.; Department of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Kahramanmaras University, 46100, Kahramanmaras, Turkey.; Department of Irrigation and Agricultural Structures, Faculty of Agriculture, Cukurova University, 01330, Adana, Turkey.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.