A randomized controlled phase III study comparing hadrontherapy with carbon ions versus conventional radiotherapy - including photon and proton therapy - for the treatment of radioresistant tumors: the ETOILE trial.

Cristina Bono, Pascal Pommier, Roberto Orecchia, Sylvie Chabaud, Pascale Guerre, Jennifer Margier, François Gueyffier, Hubert Allemand, Stéphanie Patin, Barbara Vischioni, Viviana Vitolo, Maria Rosaria Fiore, Jacques Balosso, Francesca Valvo, Valérie Plattner, Michel Lièvre, Zohra Akkal, Magali Hervé, Catherine Cornu, Abdoulkader Soumai Alloh, Hélène Lozano, Annie Iung, Olivia Febvey-Combes

Journal: BMC cancer 2022;22(1):575

PMID: 35606739

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Some cancers such as sarcomas (bone and soft tissue sarcomas) and adenoid cystic carcinomas are considered as radioresistant to low linear energy transfer radiation (including photons and protons) and may therefore beneficiate from a carbon ion therapy. Despite encouraging results obtained in phase I/II trials compared to historical data with photons, the spread of carbon ions has been limited mainly because of the absence of randomized medical data. The French health authorities stressed the importance of having randomized data for carbon ion therapy.

METHODS

The ETOILE study is a multicenter prospective randomized phase III trial comparing carbon ion therapy to either advanced photon or proton radiotherapy for inoperable or macroscopically incompletely resected (R2) radioresistant cancers including sarcomas and adenoid cystic carcinomas. In the experimental arm, carbon ion therapy will be performed at the National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO) in Pavia, Italy. In the control arm, photon or proton radiotherapy will be carried out in referent centers in France. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints are overall survival and local control, toxicity profile, and quality of life. In addition, a prospective health-economic study and a radiobiological analysis will be conducted. To demonstrate an absolute improvement in the 5-year PFS rate of 20% in favor of carbon ion therapy, 250 patients have to be included in the study.

DISCUSSION

So far, no clinical study of phase III has demonstrated the superiority of carbon ion therapy compared to conventional radiotherapy, including proton therapy, for the treatment of radioresistant tumors.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02838602 . Date of registration: July 20, 2016. The posted information will be updated as needed to reflect protocol amendments and study progress.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Address: Centre François Baclesse, Service de radiothérapie, BP 45026, F-14076, Caen, Cedex 5, France. [email protected].; Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pôle de Santé Publique, Lyon, France.; Hospices Civils de Lyon, Direction de la Recherche en Santé, Lyon, France.; UMR 5558, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.; INSERM, CIC1407, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France.; Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica, Pavia, Italy.; Groupement Coopération Sanitaire Centre Etoile, Lyon, France.; Caisse Nationale d'Assurance Maladie des Travailleurs Salariés, Paris, France.; Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, P2S UR4129, Lyon, France.; Centre Léon Bérard, Direction de la Recherche Clinique et de l'Innovation, Lyon, France.; European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.; Centre Léon Bérard, Service de Radiothérapie, Lyon, France.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.