Intragastric injection of botulinum toxin A for weight loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Yi-An Yen, Chi-Chih Wang, Wen-Wei Sung, Kuan-Chieh Fang, Shih-Ming Huang, Chun-Che Lin, Ming-Chang Tsai, Tzu-Wei Yang

Journal: Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology 2022;37(6):983-992

PMID: 35383416

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Intragastric botulinum toxin A (BTA) injection is a potential treatment for weight reduction in obese patients. Current studies yielded conflicting results. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the efficacy of intragastric BTA injection for weight management.

METHODS

We searched several databases to identify RCTs evaluating intragastric BTA injections for obesity. We applied random-effects models for all meta-analyses due to heterogeneity in the included studies. The mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for continuous outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 6 RCTs including 192 subjects met the inclusion criteria and were included for the meta-analysis. Although the pooled data from six studies showed no difference in the absolute weight loss between intragastric BTA injection and control, subgroup analysis showed a significantly decreased absolute weight after a BTA injection dose ≥ 200 U (MD, -2.04 kg; 95% CI, -3.96 to -0.12) and after multiple injection regions in the stomach combined with diet control (MD, -4.44 kg; 95% CI, -6.54 to -2.33 kg) compared with the control. Regarding absolute weight loss, the impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided injection and follow-up duration showed no difference. Intragastric BTA injection had a significant change in body mass index (MD, -1.25 kg/m ; 95% CI, -2.18 to -0.32 kg/m ) and prolonged gastric half-emptying time (MD, 11.37 min; 95% CI, -3.69 to 19.06 min).

CONCLUSION

Intragastric BTA injection is effective for obesity treatment, and adequate doses (≥ 200 U), multiple gastric injection regions, and combined diet control are crucial. However, given the small sample size and limited power, caution should be exercised.

© 2022 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Address: School of Medicine and Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.; Department of Urology, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.; Division of Gastroenterology, Internal Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Jen-Ai Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.; Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.; School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.; Weight Management Center, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.