Swimming-Induced Pulmonary Edema: Evaluation of Prehospital Treatment With CPAP or Positive Expiratory Pressure Device.

BACKGROUND

Swimming-induced pulmonary edema (SIPE) occasionally occurs during swimming in cold open water. Although optimal treatment for SIPE is unknown, non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) is an option for prehospital treatment.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Is NPPV a feasible and safe prehospital treatment for SIPE, and which outcome measures reflect recovery after treatment?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A prospective observational study was conducted at Vansbrosimningen, Sweden's largest open water swimming event, from 2017 through 2019. Swimmers with a diagnosis of SIPE and with peripheral oxygen saturation (Spo) of ≤ 95%, persistent respiratory symptoms, or both were eligible for the study. NPPV was administered on site as CPAP by facial mask or as positive expiratory pressure (PEP) by a PEP device. Discharge criteria were Spo of > 95% and clinical recovery. Four outcome measures were evaluated: Spo, crackles on pulmonary auscultation, pulmonary edema on lung ultrasound (LUS), and patient-reported respiratory symptoms.

RESULTS

Of 119 treated individuals, 94 received CPAP, 24 received treatment with a PEP device, and one required tracheal intubation. In total, 108 individuals (91%) were discharged after NPPV for a median of 10 to 20 min and 11 individuals (9%) required hospital transfer. NPPV resulted in increased Spo from a median of 91% to 97% (P < .0001) together with improvement of six patient-reported respiratory symptoms (median numerical rating scales, 1-7 to 0-1; P < .0001). No significant decrease in auscultation of crackles (93% vs 87%; P = .508) or pulmonary edema on LUS (100% vs 97%; P = .500) was seen during NPPV treatment.

INTERPRETATION

NPPV administered as CPAP or via a PEP device proved feasible and safe as prehospital treatment for SIPE with a vast majority of patients discharged on site. Spo and patient-reported respiratory symptoms reflected recovery after treatment, whereas pulmonary auscultation or LUS findings did not.

Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.