Second primary malignancies induced by radioactive iodine treatment of differentiated thyroid carcinoma - a critical review and evaluation of the existing evidence.

Maximilian J Reinecke, Gerrit Ahlers, Andreas Burchert, Friederike Eilsberger, Glenn D Flux, Robert J Marlowe, Hans-Helge Mueller, Christoph Reiners, Fenja Rohde, Hanneke M van Santen, Markus Luster

Journal: European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging 2022;49(9):3247-3256

PMID: 35320386

Abstract

PURPOSE

Concern is growing about long-term side effects of differentiated thyroid cancer treatment, most notably radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy. However, published studies on the subject have had heterogeneous cohorts and conflicting results. This review seeks to provide an updated evaluation of published evidence, and to elucidate the risk of second primary malignancies (SPMs), especially secondary hematologic malignancies (SHMs), attributable to RAI therapy.

METHODS

An extensive literature search was performed in Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE and In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Epub Ahead of Print, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and PubMed. Studies regarding RAI-induced SPMs or a dose-response relationship between RAI therapy and SPMs were identified, 10 of which were eligible for the analysis. We evaluated risk of bias in each study and judged quality of evidence (QOE) across all studies using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations approach.

RESULTS

For the outcome "SPM", the relative effect (relative risk, hazard ratio, or odds ratio) of RAI vs. no RAI ranged from 1.14 to 1.84 across studies, but most results were not statistically significant. For the outcome "SHM", reported relative effects ranged from 1.30 to 2.50, with 2/3 of the studies presenting statistically significant results. In 7/8 of the studies, increased risk for SPM was shown with increasing cumulative RAI activity. QOE was "very low" regarding SPM after RAI and regarding a dose-response relationship, and "low" for SHM after RAI.

CONCLUSION

Based on low quality evidence, an excess risk for the development of SPM cannot be excluded but is expected to be small.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Address: Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany.; Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany.; Department of Physics, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.; Spencer-Fontayne Corporation, Jersey City, NJ, 07304-1901, USA.; Institute for Medical Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.; Department of Pediatrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.; Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany. [email protected].
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.