A phase I evaluation of the effect of curcumin on dose-limiting toxicity and pharmacokinetics of irinotecan in participants with solid tumors.

Olumide B Gbolahan, Bert H O'Neil, Autumn J McRee, Hanna K Sanoff, John K Fallon, Philip C Smith, Anastasia Ivanova, Dominic T Moore, Julie Dumond, Gary N Asher

Journal: Clinical and translational science 2022;15(5):1304-1315

PMID: 35157783

Abstract

Curcumin inhibits UDP-glucuronyltransferases, a primary metabolic pathway for cancer chemotherapeutic agents like irinotecan. Concurrent administration of both agents may exacerbate irinotecan toxicity. We conducted this phase I study to determine the safety of concurrent curcumin and irinotecan administration. Ten participants with advanced solid tumors received one of four doses (1, 2, 3, and 4 g) of a curcumin phosphatidylcholine complex (PC) orally daily, and 200 mg/m of i.v. infusion irinotecan on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle, to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of PC. Thirteen participants received 4 g of PC (MTD) to assess the effect on the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of irinotecan and its metabolites, SN-38 and SN-38G. Irinotecan, SN-38, and SN-38G exposure equivalence with and without curcumin was assessed using area under the plasma concentration-time curves from 0 to 6 h (AUC ). Safety assessments and disease responses were also evaluated. The combination of irinotecan and PC was well-tolerated. Because there was no dose limiting toxicity, the maximum dose administered (4 g) was defined as the recommended phase II dose of PC. PC did not significantly alter the plasma exposure and other PK properties of irinotecan and its metabolites. There was no apparent increase in the incidence of irinotecan-associated toxicities. The objective response rate was 3/19 (22%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5-39%), median progression free survival and overall survival (n = 23) were 4 months (95% CI: 2.9-8.9 months) and 8.4 months (95% CI: 3.7 - not evaluable [NE]), respectively. Future studies are required to evaluate the efficacy of this combination.

© 2022 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.

Address: Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Alabama School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.; Community North Cancer Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.; Division of Hematology and Oncology, UNC School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.; Division of Pharmacoengineering and Molecular Pharmaceutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.; Department of Biostatistics, UNC Gillings School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.; Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.; Department of Family Medicine, UNC School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.