A systematic review examining socioeconomic factors in trials of interventions for men that report weight as an outcome.

Matthew D McDonald, Kate Hunt, Hamsini Sivaramakrishnan, Joanna Moullin, Alison Avenell, Deborah A Kerr, Jack M Birch, Nikos Ntoumanis, Eleanor Quested

Journal: Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity 2022;23(7):e13436

PMID: 35187778

Free Full Text on PubMed Central View on PubMed

Abstract

Weight management interventions designed specifically for men have become more common, but the extent to which socioeconomic factors are considered in trials of these interventions is unclear. We synthesized study characteristics, methods, and reporting of interventions with a behavioral component for men that report weight as an outcome, to establish the extent to which socioeconomic factors are considered during intervention design, conduct, and reporting. A comprehensive search was conducted on Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, and CENTRAL for studies published from January 2000 to July 2021. Thirty-six trials were included. Educational attainment (n = 24) was the most frequently reported socioeconomic characteristic, followed by working status (n = 14) and area level deprivation (n = 12). Seven studies did not report any socioeconomic characteristics. Most studies (n = 20) did not mention the socioeconomic profile of their samples in relation to study strengths or limitations. Few (n = 4) consulted with men from lower socioeconomic groups during intervention design. One study examined potential differential intervention effects across socioeconomic groups, with most not powered to do so. Recent feasibility trials (n = 3) targeting specific socioeconomic groups suggest a potential nascent towards a greater consideration of factors related to equity. To best inform public health policy related to health inequalities, greater consideration of socioeconomic factors is required in trials of men's weight management interventions.

Address: Curtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.; Physical Activity and Well-Being Research Group, enAble Institute, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.; Physical Activity and Well-Being Research Group, enAble Institute, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.; Institute for Social Marketing and Health, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.; Curtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.; Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.; Curtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.; Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.; MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.; Physical Activity and Well-Being Research Group, enAble Institute, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.; Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.; School of Health and Welfare, Halmstad University, Halmstad, Sweden.

DOI: 10.1111/obr.13436

Link outs

Free resources

Full Text Sources:

Subscription / membership required

Full Text Sources:

MeSH Terms: Humans, Male, Nutrition Therapy, Socioeconomic Factors