Exploring the safety, effect on the tumor microenvironment, and efficacy of itacitinib in combination with epacadostat or parsaclisib in advanced solid tumors: a phase I study.

Aung Naing, John D Powderly, John J Nemunaitis, Jason J Luke, Aaron S Mansfield, Wells A Messersmith, Solmaz Sahebjam, Patricia M LoRusso, Ignacio Garrido-Laguna, Lance Leopold, Ryan Geschwindt, Kai Ding, Michael Smith, Jordan D Berlin

Journal: Journal for immunotherapy of cancer 2022;10(3):e004223

PMID: 35288468

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This phase I multicenter study was designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, efficacy, and translational effects on the tumor microenvironment of itacitinib (Janus-associated kinase 1 (JAK1) inhibitor) in combination with epacadostat (indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) inhibitor) or parsaclisib (phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase δ (PI3Kδ) inhibitor).

METHODS

Patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors were enrolled and received itacitinib (100-400 mg once a day) plus epacadostat (50-300 mg two times per day; group A), or itacitinib (100-400 mg once a day) plus parsaclisib or parsaclisib monotherapy (0.3-10 mg once a day; group B).

RESULTS

A total of 142 patients were enrolled in the study. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached for either the combination of itacitinib plus epacadostat (n=47) or itacitinib plus parsaclisib (n=90). One dose-limiting toxicity of serious, grade 3 aseptic meningitis was reported in a patient receiving itacitinib 300 mg once a day plus parsaclisib 10 mg once a day, which resolved when the study drugs were withdrawn. The most common treatment-related adverse events among patients treated with itacitinib plus epacadostat included fatigue, nausea, pyrexia, and vomiting, and for patients treated with itacitinib plus parsaclisib were fatigue, pyrexia, and diarrhea. In the itacitinib plus epacadostat group, no patient had an objective response. Among patients receiving itacitinib 100 mg once a day plus parsaclisib 0.3 mg once a day, three achieved partial response for an objective response rate (95% CI) of 7.1% (1.50 to 19.48). Treatment with itacitinib plus epacadostat demonstrated some increase in tumor CD8 T cell infiltration and minor changes in six plasma proteins, whereas treatment with itacitinib plus high-dose parsaclisib resulted in downregulation of 20 plasma proteins mostly involved in immune cell function, with no observed change in intratumoral CD8 T cell infiltration.

CONCLUSION

Adverse events with JAK1 inhibition combined with either IDO1 or PI3Kδ inhibition were manageable, but the combinations demonstrated limited clinical activity or enhancement of immune activation in the tumor microenvironment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02559492.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Address: Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA [email protected].; Cancer Research Clinic, Carolina Biooncology Institute, Huntersville, North Carolina, USA.; University of Toledo College of Medicine, Toledo, Ohio, USA.; Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.; Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.; School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.; Clinical Research Unit, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.; Yale School of Medicine, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.; University of Utah School of Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.; Immuno-Oncology, Incyte Corporation, Wilmington, Delaware, USA.; Biostatistics, Incyte Corporation, Wilmington, Delaware, USA.; Division of Hematology/Oncology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.