Comparative Assessment of Qmix as Endodontic Irrigant on Reversal of Bond Strength in Teeth Subjected to Irradiation: An Scanning Electron Microscope Study.

Bharath Naga Reddy, Sabari Murugesan, Savadamoorthi Kamatchi Subramani, Ohm Nijandhan Kumar, Sujith Raj Mohan, Parthiban Saket

Journal: The journal of contemporary dental practice 2022;23(3):331-336

PMID: 35781439

Abstract

AIM

The aim of this current study was to compare and evaluate the reversal efficacy of Qmix and chitosan-based irrigation materials quantitatively through the assessment of the push-out bond strength of bioceramic sealer employing universal testing machine and to qualitatively analyze the sealer/dentin interface by scanning electron microscope (SEM) in the teeth subjected to fractioned radiation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety single-rooted straight human maxillary central incisors were randomly divided into six groups ( = 15) where in three groups comprise Chitosan, Qmix, and EDTA/sodium hypochlorite which were not exposed to irradiation while other three groups were challenged with irradiation protocols. Root canals were prepared with ProTaper universal system and all the samples were irrigated according to the final irrigation protocols and obturated with bioceramic sealers. Dentin slices were prepared with 1 mm thickness from each root third for the estimation of bond strength of sealers to dentin. Qualitative assessment of the sealer-dentin interface was done by scanning electron microscopy. Bond strength data were scrutinized by independent -test and failure modes using the Chi-square test.

RESULTS

Significantly lower bond strength ( <0.05) was recorded after irradiation compared with nonirradiated group. To quantify the results irrigation protocols, Qmix had highest bond strength followed by chitosan and EDTA/sodium hypochlorite group irrespective of irradiation status. Bond strength values reduced after irradiation in all root thirds irrespective of the irrigation materials. Scanning electron microscope images revealed traces of repair process for Qmix-based irrigation materials than the chitosan-based materials for both irradiated and nonirradiated specimens.

CONCLUSION

All the irrigation materials employed in this study had good bond strength. The specimen irrigated with Qmix had comparatively higher bond strength than the chitosan-based materials. The teeth subjected to irradiation challenge were associated with a decrease in the push-out bond strength of sealers to intraradicular dentin with formation of more gaps and fewer tags at the sealer/dentin interface.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Selection of ideal irrigation protocols still remains a challenge for the clinical practitioners, and this study explored the utilization of novel materials used for irrigation, especially in the teeth subjected to radiation.

Address: Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Adhiparasakthi Dental College and Hospital, Melmaruvathur, Tamil Nadu, India, Phone: +91 9444792260, e-mail: [email protected].; Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.; Division of Operative Dentistry and Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.; Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Adhiparasakthi Dental College and Hospital, Melmaruvathur, Tamil Nadu, India.; Department of Periodontics and Implantology, Adhiparasakthi Dental College and Hospital, Melmaruvathur, Tamil Nadu, India.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.