Outcomes of Systemic Treatment in Children and Adults With Netherton Syndrome: A Systematic Review.

Anouk E M Nouwen, Renske Schappin, N Tan Nguyen, Aviël Ragamin, Anette Bygum, Christine Bodemer, Virgil A S H Dalm, Suzanne G M A Pasmans

Journal: Frontiers in immunology 2022;13():864449

PMID: 35464459

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Comèl-Netherton syndrome (NS) is a rare disease caused by pathogenic variants in the gene, leading to severe skin barrier impairment and proinflammatory upregulation. Given the severity of the disease, treatment of NS is challenging. Current treatment regimens are mainly topical and supportive. Although novel systemic treatment options for NS have been suggested in recent literature, little is known about their outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

to provide an overview of systemic treatment options and their outcomes in adults and children with NS.

METHODS

Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar were searched up to July 22, 2021. Empirical studies published in English language mentioning systemic treatment in NS were enrolled. Studies that did not define a treatment period or report at least one outcome were excluded. Methodological quality was evaluated by the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist for case reports or case series. Overall quality of evidence of the primary outcome, skin, was assessed by the GRADE approach.

RESULTS

36 case series and case reports were included. The effects of 15 systemic therapies were described in 48 patients, of which 27 were children. Therapies included retinoids, prednisolone, cyclosporine, immunoglobulins, and biologicals. In retinoids both worsening (4/15 cases) and improvement (6/15 cases) of the skin was observed. Use of prednisolone and cyclosporine was only reported in one patient. Immunoglobulins (13/15 cases) and biologicals (18/21 cases) showed improvement of the skin. Certainty of evidence was rated as very low.

CONCLUSION

NS is a rare disease, which is reflected in the scarce literature on systemic treatment outcomes in children and adults with NS. Studies showed large heterogeneity in outcome measures. Adverse events were scarcely reported. Long-term outcomes were reported in a minority of cases. Nonetheless, a general beneficial effect of systemic treatment was found. Immunoglobulins and biologicals showed the most promising results and should be further explored. Future research should focus on determining a core outcome set and measurement instruments for NS to improve quality of research.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=217933, PROSPERO (ID: 217933).

Copyright © 2022 Nouwen, Schappin, Nguyen, Ragamin, Bygum, Bodemer, Dalm and Pasmans.

Address: Department of Dermatology-Center of Pediatric Dermatology, Erasmus University Medical Center-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands.; Department of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.; Clinical Institute, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.; Department of Dermatology, Reference Centre for Genodermatoses and Rare Skin Diseases (MAGEC), Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital (AP-HP), Paris Centre University, Paris, France.; Department of Immunology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.; Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Allergy & Clinical Immunology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.