Hui Cai, Xiaoyong Han, Rangyin Zhao, Guangming Zhang, Yajun Jiao, Yongfeng Wang, Da Wang
Journal: Frontiers in nutrition 2022;9():918777
PMID: 35845801
The incident rate of malignant tumours has been increasing, and so has colo-rectal cancer (CRC), which is now the third most frequent cancer and the second most common cause of cancer death. CRC development is influenced by environmental and genetic factors. Diet, diabetes, obesity, lack of physical activity, age, family history and history of benign adenomatous polyps and inflammatory bowel disease are all known risk factors. Modulating diet is one way to modify cancer risk. Vitamin A (retinol) and carotenoids, which are precursors to Vitamin A, are indispensable in the human body and widely occur in a range of vegetables, fruits and animal-derived foods. In some studies high dietary intake of retinol and carotenoids had been linked to a decreased risk of CRC, however, this was not consistent in all findings. To get a better understanding of this matter, the authors of this meta-analysis analysed 22 clinical studies from the last 20 years. The authors found an inverse association with carotenoids in blood serum, so higher blood serum of carotenoids seemed to decrease CRC risk. In regards to dietary intake, total carotenoid intake did not increase CRC risk and in fact the carotenoids carotenes, lycopene, and β-cryptoxanthin reduced risk, which was particularly noticeable in men. In women, high dietary intake of retinol also showed to reduce CRC risk, but it appeared to increase the risk in men. This raised the idea of gender-specific differences. Of clinical relevance are that carotenoids can be an important dietary contributors in reducing CRC risk. However the protective role of retinol appears to be gender-specific and only seems to benefit women, with the opposite effect in men.
None
The results of this study were mixed:
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide, and second in terms of mortality. Diet and environmental factors may have a strong influence and causative effect. Research has linked dietary consumption and serum levels of carotenoids and retinol with CRC. However, results have been mixed.
The aim of this meta analysis was to identify a potential association between CRC and carotenoid and retinol intake. A total of 22 cohort and case control studies published between 2000-2019 from across Europe, North America and Asia were included. The number of CRC cases totalled 19,293 from a sample of more than 450,000 people.
Eligible studies reported data in either relative risk (RR) or odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). In the meta analysis, data were combined and expressed as OR with 95% CI. Cases and control groups were based on high or low carotenoid intake as defined by the included studies and based on dietary intake or serum concentration. Sub-group analysis was undertaken by study type, sex and tumour type. A sensitivity analysis tested the robustness of the results.
Due to the heterogeneity between studies, adjustments were made for potential covariates and confounding factors including age, gender, a family history of CRC, smoking, alcohol consumption and levels of physical activity.
The quality of the studies was assessed against predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria and scored using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).
The nutrients studied included; beta-carotene, alpha-carotene, lycopene, lutein/zeaxanthin, beta-cryptoxanthin and retinol. These were assessed through dietary intake or serum concentrations.
Key Findings
Conclusions This was a well-conducted meta-analysis that was not subject to any conflicts of interest. Larger, well controlled prospective studies adjusting for sex and with long-term follow-up are needed to confirm the relationship between dietary intake and serum levels of carotenoids and CRC.
Notes: The authors had no conflicts of interest to disclose.
BACKGROUND
Colorectal cancer (CRC) risk is linked to serum and dietary retinol and carotenoids, according to clinical and epidemiological research. However, the findings are not consistent. As a result, we did this meta-analysis to determine the link between them.
METHODS
From 2000 through 2022, the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases, as well as pertinent article references, were searched and filtered based on inclusion and exclusion criteria and literature quality ratings. High and low intake were used as controls, and OR (odds ratio) or RR (relative risk) and 95% confidence interval were extracted. The extracted data were plotted and analyzed using Stata12.0 software.
RESULTS
A total of 22 relevant studies were included, including 18 studies related to diet and 4 studies related to serum. For high and low intake or concentration controls, the pooled OR was as follows: β-carotene (OR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.78-1.03), α-carotene (OR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.72-1.03), lycopene (OR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.81-1.07), lutein/zeaxanthin (OR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.87-1.07), β-cryptoxanthin (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.48-1.01), total carotenoids (OR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.81-1.15), retinol (OR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.89-1.10), serum carotenoids (OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.58-0.93), serum retinol (OR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.26-1.49). Subgroup analysis was performed according to tumor type, study type and sex.
CONCLUSION
Total carotenoid intake and Lutein/Zeaxanthin intake were not associated with CRC risk. High β-carotene, α-carotene, lycopene, and β-cryptoxanthin all tended to reduce CRC risk. Serum carotenoid concentrations were significantly inversely associated with CRC risk.
Copyright © 2022 Han, Zhao, Zhang, Jiao, Wang, Wang and Cai.
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.