Marco Fornaro, Francesco Girolamo, Lorenzo Cavagna, Franco Franceschini, Margherita Giannini, Angela Amati, Anna Lia, Marilina Tampoia, Dario D'Abbicco, Lorenzo Maggi, Micaela Fredi, Giovanni Zanframundo, Liala Moschetti, Laura Coladonato, Florenzo Iannone
Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford, England) 2021;60(6):2916-2926
PMID: 33249503
OBJECTIVE
The aim of our study was to investigate clinical and histopathological findings in adult DM patients positive for anti-Mi2 (anti-Mi2+) antibodies compared with DM patients negative for anti-Mi2 (anti-Mi2-).
METHODS
Clinical data of adult DM patients, who fulfilled EULAR/ACR 2017 classification criteria, were gathered from electronic medical records of three tertiary Rheumatology Units. Histopathological study was carried out on 12 anti-Mi2+ and 14 anti-Mi2- muscle biopsies performed for diagnostic purpose. Nine biopsies from immune mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM) patients were used as control group.
RESULTS
Twenty-two anti-Mi2+ DM [90.9% female, mean age 56.5 (15.7) years] were compared with 69 anti-Mi2- DM patients [71% female, mean age 52.4 (17) years]. Anti-Mi2+ patients presented higher levels of serum muscle enzymes than anti-Mi2- patients [median (IQR) creatine-kinase fold increment: 16 (7-37)vs 3.5 (1-9.9), P <0.001] before treatment initiation. Moreover, a trend towards less pulmonary involvement was detected in anti-Mi2+ DM (9.1% vs 30.4%, P =0.05), without any case of rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease. At muscle histology, anti-Mi2+ patients showed more necrotic/degenerative fibres than anti-Mi2- patients [mean 5.3% (5) vs 0.8% (1), P <0.01], but similar to IMNM [5.9% (6), P >0.05]. In addition, the endomysial macrophage score was similar between anti-Mi2+ and IMNM patients [mean 1.2 (0.9) vs 1.3 (0.5), P >0.05], whereas lower macrophage infiltration was found in anti-Mi2- DM [mean 0.4 (0.5), <0.01].
CONCLUSIONS
Anti-Mi2+ patients represent a specific DM subset with high muscle damage. Histological hallmarks were a higher prevalence of myofiber necrosis, endomysial involvement and macrophage infiltrates at muscle biopsy.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: [email protected].
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.