Determinants of kidney transplant candidates' decision to accept organ donor intervention transplants and participate in post-transplant research: A conjoint analysis.

Elisa J Gordon, Peter Abt, Jungwha Lee, Elizabeth Knopf, Caitlin Phillips, Francisca Bermudez, Lakshman Krishnamurthi, Huseyin S Karaca, Robert Veatch, Richard Knight, Paul T Conway, Sue Dunn, Peter P Reese

Journal: Clinical transplantation 2021;35(6):e14316

PMID: 33844367

Abstract

Deceased organ donor intervention research aims to increase organ quality and quantity for transplantation. We assessed the proportion of kidney transplant candidates who would accept "intervention organs," participate in organ intervention research, and factors influencing acceptance. Kidney transplant candidates were presented 12 hypothetical scenarios, which varied three attributes, donor age, predicted waiting time to receive another organ offer, and research risk to the organ. Candidates were also randomly assigned to one of two conditions varying recipient risk. For each scenario, candidates agreed to accept the intervention organ or remain waitlisted. We fit a multivariable logit model to determine the association between scenario attributes and the acceptance decision. Of 249 participants, most (96%) accepted intervention organs under some or all conditions. Factors independently associated with candidates' greater likelihood of accepting an intervention organ included: low risk to the kidney from the intervention (OR 20.53 [95% Confidence Interval (CI), 13.91-30.29]); younger donor age (OR 3.72 [95% CI, 2.83-4.89]), longer time until the next organ offer (OR 3.48 [95% CI, 2.65-4.57]), and greater trust in their transplant physician (OR 1.03 [95% CI, 1.00-1.06]). Candidates with a lower likelihood of acceptance had been waitlisted longer (OR 0.97 per month [95% CI, 0.96-0.99]) and were Black (OR 0.21 [95% CI, 0.08-0.55]). Most candidates would accept an intervention organ, which should encourage transplant leaders to conduct deceased donor organ intervention trials.

© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Address: Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.; Center for Health Services and Outcomes Research, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.; Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.; Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.; Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.; Department of Marketing, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.; Department of Management, Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey.; Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.; American Association of Kidney Patients, Washington, DC, USA.; Donor Alliance, Denver, CO, USA.; Department of Medicine, Renal-Electrolyte & Hypertension Division, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.