Safety of SF6(SonoVue®) Contrast Agent on Pharmacological Stress Echocardiogram.

Rogerio Gomes Furtado, Daniela do Carmo Rassi, Luciano Henrique Melato, Ana Caroline Reinaldo de Oliveira, Paula Meneses Nunes, Priscila Elias Baccelli, Sara Camila de Oliveira Santos, Victor Emanuel Santos, Luiz Rassi Junior, Colandy Godoy Nunes

Journal: Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia 2021;117(6):1170-1178

PMID: 34644784

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2007, the United States Food and Drug Administration mandated safety reviews of commercially available echocardiographic contrast agents (ECA), following reports of death. During the past years, different studies have proven the safety of ECA, but there have been few studies on SonoVue®.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety of SonoVue® during pharmacological stress echocardiography (PSE), by analyzing the incidence of allergic reactions and comparing groups regarding the appearance of arrhythmia, minor side effects and adverse events.

METHODS

In this observational, prospective study, 2346 patients underwent PSE, and they were divided into the following 2 groups: group 1 with ECA (n = 1099) and group 2 without ECA (n = 1247). Patients were evaluated during PSE, at 24 hours, and at 30 days. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Group 1 had fewer minor side effects, such as headache (5/0.5% versus 19/1.5%, p = 0.012) and less reactive hypertension (3/0.3% versus 19/1.5%, p = 0.002); fewer arrhythmias, such as ventricular extrasystoles (180/16.4% versus 247/19.8%, p = 0.032) and paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (2/0.2% versus 15/1.2%, p = 0.003); and no adverse events, such as acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or death. In group 2, 1 patient had AMI in < 24 hours (1/01%), and there were 2 deaths in < 30 days (2/0.1%). SonoVue®-related urticaria was seen in 3 (0.3%) patients, without anaphylactic reaction.

CONCLUSION

SonoVue® demonstrated safety during PSE. No cases of death, AMI, or anaphylactic reaction were observed. There was a lower incidence of minor side effects and arrhythmias in the group that received ECA, as well as a low incidence of mild allergic reactions.

Address: Centro de Diagnóstico por Imagem (CDI), Goiânia, GO - Brasil.; Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, GO - Brasil.; Hospital Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Goiânia, Goiânia, GO - Brasil.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.