Impact of using different predictive equations on the prevalence of chronic byssinosis in textile workers in Pakistan.

Asaad Ahmed Nafees, Muhammad Zia Muneer, Sara De Matteis, Andre Amaral, Peter Burney, Paul Cullinan

Journal: Occupational and environmental medicine 2022;79(4):242-244

PMID: 34799440

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Byssinosis remains a significant problem among textile workers in low/middle-income countries. Here we share our experience of using different prediction equations for assessing 'chronic' byssinosis according to the standard WHO classification using measurements of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV).

METHODS

We enrolled 1910 workers in a randomised controlled trial of an intervention to improve the health of textile workers in Pakistan. We included in analyses the 1724 (90%) men who performed pre-bronchodilator spirometry tests of acceptable quality. We compared four different equations for deriving lung function percentage predicted values among those with symptoms-based byssinosis: the third US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES-III, with 'North Indian and Pakistani' conversion factor); the Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI, 'other or mixed ethnicities'); a recent equation derived from survey of a western Indian population; and one based on an older and smaller survey of Karachi residents.

RESULTS

58 men (3.4%) had symptoms-based byssinosis according to WHO criteria. Of these, the proportions with a reduced FEV (<80% predicted) identified using NHANES and GLI; Indian and Pakistani reference equations were 40%, 41%, 14% and 12%, respectively. Much of this variation was eliminated when we substituted FEV/forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio (

CONCLUSION

Accurate measures of occupational disease frequency and distribution require approaches that are both standardised and meaningful. We should reconsider the WHO definition of 'chronic' byssinosis based on changes in FEV, and instead use the FEV/FVC.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Address: Department of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan [email protected].; National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.; Department of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.; National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.; Department of Medical Sceinces and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.; National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.