Risk factors associated with heel pressure ulcer development in adult population: A systematic literature review.

Alisen Dube, Viola Sidambe, Amy Verdon, Eloise Phillips, Sarahjane Jones, Maxine Lintern, Mark Radford

Journal: Journal of tissue viability 2022;31(1):84-103

PMID: 34742635

Free Full Text on Elsevier Science View on PubMed

Abstract

AIMS

The main aim of this systematic literature review was to identify risk factors for development of heel pressure ulcers and quantify their effect.

BACKGROUND

Pressure ulcers remain one of the key patient safety challenges across all health care settings and heels are the second most common site for developing pressure ulcers after the sacrum.

DESIGN

Quantitative systematic review.

METHODS

Data sources: Electronic databases were searched for studies published between 1809 to March 2020 using keywords, Medical Subject Headings, and other index terms, as well as combinations of these terms and appropriate synonyms.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Previous systematic literature reviews, cohort, case control and cross-sectional studies investigating risk factors for developing heel pressure ulcers. Only articles published in English were reviewed with no restrictions on date of publication.

PARTICIPANTS

patients aged 18 years and above in any care setting. Study selection, data extraction, risk of bias and quality assessment were completed by two independent reviewers. Disagreements were resolved by discussion.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies met the eligibility criteria and several potential risk factors were identified. However, eligible studies were mainly moderate to low quality except for three high quality studies.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a paucity of high quality evidence to identify risk factors associated with heel pressure ulcer development. Immobility, diabetes, vascular disease, impaired nutrition, perfusion issues, mechanical ventilation, surgery, and Braden subscales were identified as potential risk factors for developing heel pressure ulcers however, further well-designed studies are required to elucidate these factors. Other risk factors may also exist and require further investigation.

PROSPERO ID

PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews: CRD42017071459.

Address: Faculty of Health, Education and Life Sciences, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK; School of Health, Science, and Wellbeing, Staffordshire University, Staffordshire, UK; University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK. Electronic address: [email protected].; University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.; School of Pharmacy, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.; School of Health, Science, and Wellbeing, Staffordshire University, Staffordshire, UK.; Faculty of Business, Law and Social Sciences, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK.; Faculty of Health, Education and Life Sciences, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK; Health Education England, Birmingham, UK; NHS England and NHS Improvement, Birmingham, UK.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jtv.2021.10.007