Assessment of receptor affinities of ophthalmic and systemic agents in dry eye disease.

Patrick Janeczko, Matthew R Norris, Leonard Bielory

Journal: Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology 2021;21(5):480-485

PMID: 34387278

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To explore our current understanding of receptor profiles acted upon by medications used to treat dry eye disease (DED).

RECENT FINDINGS

Research into histaminic and muscarinic receptor affinities for drugs targeting the ocular surface has not kept up with bench research pertaining to the receptor profile of the ocular surface. These insights are necessary for better evaluation of medications used in DED and other allergic disorders.

SUMMARY

At the H1 receptor, Ketotifen (pKa = 9.2), pyrilamine (pKa = 9.0), and epinastine (pKa = 8.0) had the highest affinities, whereas ranitidine (pKa = 4.2) and cimetidine (pKa = 4.9) had the lowest. Ketotifen, a second-generation antihistamine, was found to have a pKa of 6.7 at muscarinic receptors which was higher than that of diphenhydramine (pKa = 6.4), a first-generation antihistamine. Additionally, second-generation antihistamines have higher affinity for H3 receptors, which have been linked to urticaria, compared to first-generation. Azelastine, a second-generation, demonstrated significant affinity (pKa = 7.1) at the H3 receptor compared to all other drugs. Antazoline (pKa = 4.4) and diphenhydramine (pKa = 4.6), both first-generation antihistamines, had the lowest affinities for the H3 receptor. These findings raise questions about the use of antihistamines in the treatment of DED and allergic disorders.

Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Address: Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Nutley.; Department of Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA.; Rutgers University Center for Environmental Prediction, New Brunswick, New Jersey.; Thomas Jefferson University Sidney Kimmel School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.; Kean University, Center for Aerobiological Research, Union, New Jersey, USA.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.