Ellen A Lipstein, William B Brinkman, Yin Zhang, Kevin A Hommel, Richard F Ittenbach, Chunyan Liu, Lee A Denson
Journal: Patient education and counseling 2022;105(5):1075-1081
PMID: 34629231
OBJECTIVE
We conducted a pre-post pilot trial to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a multi-component intervention (pre-clinic letter, shared decision making cards and follow-up phone call) designed to facilitate SDM in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
METHODS
We recruited physicians (n = 11) caring for IBD patients and families (n = 36) expected to discuss anti-tumor necrosis treatment. We measured feasibility and acceptability of the intervention, observed SDM, perceived SDM, decision conflict, and regret. Medical records were used to assess clinical outcomes, time to decision and adherence. We compared all outcomes between the usual care and intervention study arms.
RESULTS
Two out of three intervention components were feasible. Visit length increased significantly in the intervention arm. Parents and patients rated the intervention as acceptable, as did most physicians. The intervention was associated with a higher-level of observed SDM. There was no difference perceived SDM, decision conflict, regret or quality of life outcomes between arms. Physician global assessment improved over time in the intervention arm.
CONCLUSIONS
This pilot trial provides important guidance for developing a larger scale trial of a modified intervention.
PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS
Overall, our intervention shows promise in supporting SDM and engaging both parents and patients in pediatric IBD decisions.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Miscellaneous:
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.