Mask decontamination methods (model N95) for respiratory protection: a rapid review.

Livia Fernandes Probst, Ana Tereza Gomes Guerrero, Andréia Insabralde de Queiroz Cardoso, Antonio Jose Grande, Mariana Garcia Croda, James Venturini, Maria Cristina de Camargo Fonseca, Anamaria Mello Miranda Paniago, Jorge Otávio Maia Barreto, Sandra Maria do Vale Leone de Oliveira

Journal: Systematic reviews 2021;10(1):219

PMID: 34364396

Abstract

BACKGROUND

N95 respiratory protection masks are used by healthcare professionals to prevent contamination from infectious microorganisms transmitted by droplets or aerosols.

METHODS

We conducted a rapid review of the literature analyzing the effectiveness of decontamination methods for mask reuse. The database searches were carried out up to September 2020. The systematic review was conducted in a way which simplified the stages of a complete systematic review, due to the worldwide necessity for reliable fast evidences on this matter.

RESULTS

A total of 563 articles were retrieved of which 48 laboratory-based studies were selected. Fifteen decontamination methods were included in the studies. A total of 19 laboratory studies used hydrogen peroxide, 21 studies used ultraviolet germicidal irradiation, 4 studies used ethylene oxide, 11 studies used dry heat, 9 studies used moist heat, 5 studies used ethanol, two studies used isopropanol solution, 11 studies used microwave oven, 10 studies used sodium hypochlorite, 7 studies used autoclave, 3 studies used an electric rice cooker, 1 study used cleaning wipes, 1 study used bar soap, 1 study used water, 1 study used multi-purpose high-level disinfection cabinet, and another 1 study used chlorine dioxide. Five methods that are promising are as follows: hydrogen peroxide vapor, ultraviolet irradiation, dry heat, wet heat/pasteurization, and microwave ovens.

CONCLUSIONS

We have presented the best available evidence on mask decontamination; nevertheless, its applicability is limited due to few studies on the topic and the lack of studies on real environments.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Address: Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil.; Health Technology Assessment Unit, Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo, Brazil.; Institute of Technology in Immunobiologicals: Bio-Manguinhos. Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.; Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul , Campo Grande, Brazil.; Faculty of Medicine , State University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Brazil.; State University of Feira de Santana, Feira de Santana, Brazil.; Fiocruz School of Government Fiocruz Brasília, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Brasília, Brazil. [email protected].; Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul , Campo Grande, Brazil. [email protected].
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.