Efficacy and Safety of Cannabidiol Plus Standard Care vs Standard Care Alone for the Treatment of Emotional Exhaustion and Burnout Among Frontline Health Care Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Karla Cristinne Mancini Costa, Jaime E C Hallak, Maristela Haddad Andraus, Srijan Sen, Karina Pereira-Lima, Danillo L A Esposito, Benedito A L Fonseca, Flávio Kapczinski, Raphael Mechoulam, Isabela Pires-Dos-Santos, Franciele Franco Scarante, Davi Silveira Scomparin, José Alexandre S Crippa, Rafael Rinaldi Ferreira, Julia Cozar Pacheco, Juliana Mayumi Ushirohira, José Diogo S Souza, Rafael G Dos Santos, Sonia Regina Loureiro, Flávia de Lima Osório, Alline Cristina Campos, Francisco S Guimarães, Antonio W Zuardi

Journal: JAMA network open 2021;4(8):e2120603

PMID: 34387679

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Frontline health care professionals who work with patients with COVID-19 have an increased incidence of burnout symptoms. Cannabidiol (CBD) has anxiolytic and antidepressant properties and may be capable of reducing emotional exhaustion and burnout symptoms.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the safety and efficacy of CBD therapy for the reduction of emotional exhaustion and burnout symptoms among frontline health care professionals working with patients with COVID-19.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This prospective open-label single-site randomized clinical trial used a 1:1 block randomization design to examine emotional exhaustion and burnout symptoms among frontline health care professionals (physicians, nurses, and physical therapists) working with patients with COVID-19 at the Ribeirão Preto Medical School University Hospital in São Paulo, Brazil. Participants were enrolled between June 12 and November 12, 2020. A total of 214 health care professionals were recruited and assessed for eligibility, and 120 participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio by a researcher who was not directly involved with data collection.

INTERVENTIONS

Cannabidiol, 300 mg (150 mg twice per day), plus standard care or standard care alone for 28 days.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was emotional exhaustion and burnout symptoms, which were assessed for 28 days using the emotional exhaustion subscale of the Brazilian version of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey for Medical Personnel.

RESULTS

A total of 120 participants were randomized to receive either CBD, 300 mg, plus standard care (treatment arm; n = 61) or standard care alone (control arm; n = 59) for 28 days. Of those, 118 participants (59 participants in each arm; 79 women [66.9%]; mean age, 33.6 years [95% CI, 32.3-34.9 years]) received the intervention and were included in the efficacy analysis. In the treatment arm, scores on the emotional exhaustion subscale of the Maslach Burnout Inventory significantly decreased at day 14 (mean difference, 4.14 points; 95% CI, 1.47-6.80 points; partial eta squared [ηp2] = 0.08), day 21 (mean difference, 4.34 points; 95% CI, 0.94-7.73 points; ηp2 = 0.05), and day 28 (mean difference, 4.01 points; 95% CI, 0.43-7.59 points; ηp2 = 0.04). However, 5 participants, all of whom were in the treatment group, experienced serious adverse events: 4 cases of elevated liver enzymes (1 critical and 3 mild, with the mild elevations reported at the final 28-day assessment) and 1 case of severe pharmacodermia. In 2 of those cases (1 with critical elevation of liver enzymes and 1 with severe pharmacodermia), CBD therapy was discontinued, and the participants had a full recovery.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, CBD therapy reduced symptoms of burnout and emotional exhaustion among health care professionals working with patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, it is necessary to balance the benefits of CBD therapy with potential undesired or adverse effects. Future double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trials are needed to confirm the present findings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04504877.

Address: Department of Neuroscience and Behavior, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.; National Institute for Science and Technology-Translational Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil.; Department of Pharmacology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.; Institute for Drug Research, School of Pharmacy, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.; Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Graduate Program in Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.; Department of Internal Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.; Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.; Department of Psychiatry, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.; Chromatox Laboratory, São Paulo, Brazil.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.