Second-line therapy of ovarian cancer with Paclitaxel administered by both the intravenous and intraperitoneal routes: rationale and case reports.

Maurie Markman, Barbara Kulp, Gertrude Peterson, Alexander Kennedy, Jerome Belinson

Journal: Gynecologic oncology 2002;86(1):95-8

PMID: 12079307

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A strong rationale can be proposed to support the delivery of paclitaxel by both the intravenous and the intraperitoneal routes in the management of ovarian cancer. This includes efforts to increase the concentration and duration of exposure of this cycle-specific agent within the body compartment (regional therapy) and a desire to optimize delivery of drug to tumor by capillary flow (systemic therapy).

CASE REPORTS

Two patients cared for in the Gynecologic Cancer Program of the Cleveland Clinic Foundation provided an opportunity to explore, in a preliminary manner, the feasibility and toxicity of this unique approach. Both patients demonstrated reasonable tolerance of the dual-route management strategy.

CONCLUSION

In a carefully selected patient population, the administration of paclitaxel both systemically and regionally is a rational management strategy. Randomized controlled clinical trials will be required to determine if this approach is superior to standard intravenous drug delivery.

(c) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA).

Address: Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center, Department of Gynecology/Obstetrics, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA. [email protected]

Link outs

Subscription / membership required

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.