Management of Opioid-Induced Constipation and Bowel Dysfunction: Expert Opinion of an Italian Multidisciplinary Panel.

Roberto De Giorgio, Furio Massimino Zucco, Giuseppe Chiarioni, Sebastiano Mercadante, Enrico Stefano Corazziari, Augusto Caraceni, Patrizio Odetti, Raffaele Giusti, Franco Marinangeli, Carmine Pinto

Journal: Advances in therapy 2021;38(7):3589-3621

PMID: 34086265

Abstract

The prescribing and use of opioid analgesics is increasing in Italy owing to a profusion in the number and types of opioid analgesic products available, and the increasing prevalence of conditions associated with severe pain, the latter being related to population aging. Herein we provide the expert opinion of an Italian multidisciplinary panel on the management of opioid-induced constipation (OIC) and bowel dysfunction. OIC and opioid-induced bowel dysfunction are well-recognised unwanted effects of treatment with opioid analgesics that can profoundly affect quality of life. OIC can be due to additional factors such as reduced mobility, a low-fibre diet, comorbidities, and concomitant medications. Fixed-dose combinations of opioids with mu (μ) opioid receptor antagonists, such as oxycodone/naloxone, have become available, but have limited utility in clinical practice because the individual components cannot be independently titrated, creating a risk of breakthrough pain as the dose is increased. A comprehensive prevention and management strategy for OIC should include interventions that aim to improve fibre and fluid intake, increase mobility or exercise, and restore bowel function without compromising pain control. Recommended first-line pharmacological treatment of OIC is with an osmotic laxative (preferably polyethylene glycol [macrogol]), or a stimulant laxative such as an anthraquinone. A second laxative with a complementary mechanism of action should be added in the event of an inadequate response. Second-line treatment with a peripherally acting μ opioid receptor antagonist (PAMORA), such as methylnaltrexone, naloxegol or naldemedine, should be considered in patients with OIC that has not responded to combination laxative treatment. Prokinetics or intestinal secretagogues, such as lubiprostone, may be appropriate in the third-line setting, but their use in OIC is off-label in Italy, and should therefore be restricted to settings such as specialist centres and clinical trials.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Address: Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Via Aldo Moro 8, 44124, Ferrara, Italy. [email protected].; School of Specialization in Geriatric Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.; Division of Gastroenterology of the University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata (AOUI) Verona, Verona, Italy.; UNC Center for Functional GI and Motility Disorders, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.; Department of Oncology, La Maddalena, Palermo, Italy.; Department of Gastroenterology, Clinical Institute Humanitas, Milan, Italy.; High-Complexity Unit of Palliative Care, Pain Therapy and Rehabilitation, IRCSS Foundation National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy.; Department of Geriatrics and Gerontology, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.; High-Complexity Medical Oncology Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy.; Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Treatment, Intensive and Palliative Care, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.; High-Complexity Oncology Unit, Clinical Cancer Center, IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.