Genome downsizing after polyploidy: mechanisms, rates and selection pressures.

Xiaotong Wang, Joseph A Morton, Jaume Pellicer, Ilia J Leitch, Andrew R Leitch

Journal: The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology 2021;107(4):1003-1015

PMID: 34077584

Abstract

["An analysis of over 10\u00a0000 plant genome sizes (GSs) indicates that most species have smaller genomes than expected given the incidence of polyploidy in their ancestries, suggesting selection for genome downsizing. However, comparing ancestral GS with the incidence of ancestral polyploidy suggests that the rate of DNA loss following polyploidy is likely to have been very low (4-70\u00a0Mb\/million years, 4-482\u00a0bp\/generation). This poses a problem. How might such small DNA losses be visible to selection, overcome the power of genetic drift and drive genome downsizing? Here we explore that problem, focussing on the role that double-strand break (DSB) repair pathways (non-homologous end joining and homologous recombination) may have played. We also explore two hypotheses that could explain how selection might favour genome downsizing following polyploidy: to reduce (i) nitrogen (N) and phosphate (P) costs associated with nucleic acid synthesis in the nucleus and the transcriptome and (ii) the impact of scaling effects of GS on cell size, which influences CO uptake and water loss. We explore the hypothesis that losses of DNA must be fastest in early polyploid generations. Alternatively, if DNA loss is a more continuous process over evolutionary time, then we propose it is a byproduct of selection elsewhere, such as limiting the damaging activity of repetitive DNA. If so, then the impact of GS on photosynthesis, water use efficiency and\/or nutrient costs at the nucleus level may be emergent properties, which have advantages, but not ones that could have been selected for over generational timescales.",{"copyright":"\u00a9 2021 The Authors. The Plant Journal published by Society for Experimental Biology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd."}]
Address: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, TW9 3AB, UK.; Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS, UK.; Institut Botànic de Barcelona (IBB, CSIC-Ajuntament de Barcelona), Passeig del Migdia sn, Barcelona, 08038, Spain.

Link outs

Subscription / membership required

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.