Examination of Metoprolol Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Across CYP2D6 Genotype-Derived Activity Scores.

Cameron D Thomas, Scott A Mosley, Sarah Kim, Karthik Lingineni, Nihal El Rouby, Taimour Y Langaee, Yan Gong, Danxin Wang, Siegfried O Schmidt, Philip F Binkley, David S Estores, Kairui Feng, Hyewon Kim, Minori Kinjo, Zhichuan Li, Lanyan Fang, Arlene B Chapman, Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoff, John G Gums, Issam S Hamadeh, Liang Zhao, Stephan Schmidt, Reginald F Frye, Julie A Johnson, Larisa H Cavallari

Journal: CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology 2021;9(12):678-685

PMID: 33067866

Abstract

Recent CYP2D6 phenotype standardization efforts by CYP2D6 activity score (AS) are based on limited pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) data. Using data from two independent clinical trials of metoprolol, we compared metoprolol PK and PD across CYP2D6 AS with the goal of determining whether the PK and PD data support the new phenotype classification. S-metoprolol apparent oral clearance (CLo), adjusted for clinical factors, was correlated with CYP2D6 AS (P < 0.001). The natural log of CLo was lower with an AS of 1 (7.6 ± 0.4 mL/minute) vs. 2-2.25 (8.3 ± 0.6 mL/minute; P = 0.012), similar between an AS of 1 and 1.25-1.5 (7.8 ± 0.5 mL/minute; P = 0.702), and lower with an AS of 1.25-1.5 vs. 2-2.25 (P = 0.03). There was also a greater reduction in heart rate with metoprolol among study participants with AS of 1 (-10.8 ± 5.5) vs. 2-2.25 (-7.1 ± 5.6; P < 0.001) and no significant difference between those with an AS of 1 and 1.25-1.5 (-9.2 ± 4.7; P = 0.095). These data highlight linear trends among CYP2D6 AS and metoprolol PK and PD, but inconsistencies with the phenotypes assigned by AS based on the current standards. Overall, this case study with metoprolol suggests that utilizing CYP2D6 AS, instead of collapsing AS into phenotype categories, may be the most precise approach for utilizing CYP2D6 pharmacogenomics in clinical practice.

© 2020 The Authors. CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.

Address: Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translation Research, Center for Pharmacogenomics and Precision Medicine, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.; Department of Pharmaceutics, Center for Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.; Department of Community Health and Family Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.; Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.; Office of Research and Standards, Office of Generic Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.; Biological Sciences Division, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.; Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translation Research, Center for Pharmacogenomics and Precision Medicine, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.