Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, pilot trial to investigate safety and efficacy of Cerebrolysin in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Peter Y M Woo, Joanna W K Ho, Natalie M W Ko, Ronald P T Li, Leo Jian, Alberto C H Chu, Marco C L Kwan, Yung Chan, Alain K S Wong, Hoi-Tung Wong, Kwong-Yau Chan, John C K Kwok

Journal: BMC neurology 2021;20(1):401

PMID: 33143640

Abstract

ASBTRACT

BACKGROUND: There are limited neuroprotective treatment options for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Cerebrolysin, a brain-specific proposed pleiotropic neuroprotective agent, has been suggested to improve global functional outcomes in ischemic stroke. We investigated the efficacy, safety and feasibility of administering Cerebrolysin for SAH patients.

METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-center, parallel-group pilot study. Fifty patients received either daily Cerebrolysin (30 ml/day) or a placebo (saline) for 14 days (25 patients per study group). The primary endpoint was a favorable Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE) of 5 to 8 (moderate disability to good recovery) at six-months. Secondary endpoints included the modified Ranking Scale (mRS), the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) score, occurrence of adverse effects and the occurrence of delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI).

RESULTS

No severe adverse effects or mortality attributable to Cerebrolysin were observed. No significant difference was detected in the proportion of patients with favorable six-month GOSE in either study group (odds ratio (OR): 1.49; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.43-5.17). Secondary functional outcome measures for favorable six-month recovery i.e. a mRS of 0 to 3 (OR: 3.45; 95% CI 0.79-15.01) were comparable for both groups. Similarly, there was no difference in MOCA neurocognitive performance (p-value: 0.75) and in the incidence of DCI (OR: 0.85 95% CI: 0.28-2.59).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of Cerebrolysin in addition to standard-of-care management of aneurysmal SAH is safe, well tolerated and feasible. However, the neutral results of this trial suggest that it does not improve the six-month global functional performance of patients.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Name of Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov Trial Registration Number: NCT01787123 . Date of Registration: 8th February 2013.

Address: Department of Neurosurgery, Kwong Wah Hospital, Room CS11-01, 11th Floor, 25 Waterloo Road, Yaumatei, Hong Kong, China. [email protected].; Department of Neurosurgery, Kwong Wah Hospital, Room CS11-01, 11th Floor, 25 Waterloo Road, Yaumatei, Hong Kong, China.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.