Administration Method of Adjuvant Tegafur-Uracil and Leucovorin Calcium in Patients with Resected Colorectal Cancer: A Phase III Study.

Taishi Hata, Kiyotaka Hagihara, Anna Tsutsui, Hiroki Akamatsu, Masayuki Ohue, Tatsushi Shingai, Mitsuyoshi Tei, Masakazu Ikenaga, Ho Min Kim, Hideki Osawa, Hiroyoshi Takemoto, Ken Konishi, Mamoru Uemura, Chu Matsuda, Tsunekazu Mizushima, Kohei Murata, Yuko Ohno, Yuichiro Doki, Hidetoshi Eguchi

Journal: The oncologist 2021;26(5):e735-e741

PMID: 33604941

Abstract

LESSONS LEARNED

The 3-year disease-free survival rate of the twice-daily regimen was not inferior to that of the conventional three-times-daily regimen, and the twice-daily regimen did not lead to an increase in adverse events. The effectiveness of the twice-daily regimen highlights an increased number of treatment options for patients. This will facilitate personalized medicine, particularly for elderly or frail patients who may experience more severe side effects from the combination therapy.

BACKGROUND

Tegafur-uracil (UFT)/leucovorin calcium (LV) is an adjuvant chemotherapy treatment for colorectal cancer. We conducted a multicenter randomized trial to assess the noninferiority of a twice-daily compared with a three-times-daily UFT/LV regimen for stage II/III colorectal cancer in an adjuvant setting.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to group A (three doses of UFT [300 mg/m per day]/LV [75 mg per day]) or B (two doses of UFT [300 mg/m per day]/LV [50 mg per day]). The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival.

RESULTS

In total, 386 patients were enrolled between July 28, 2011, and September 27, 2013. The 3-year disease-free survival rates of group A (n = 194) and B (n = 192) were 79.4% and 81.4% (95% confidence interval, 72.6-84.4-74.5-85.9), respectively. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events in group A and B were diarrhea (3.9% vs. 7.3%), neutropenia (2.9% vs. 1.6%), increase in aspartate aminotransferase (4.0% vs. 3.9%), increase in alanine aminotransferase (6.2% vs. 6.8%), nausea (1.7% vs. 3.4%), and fatigue (1.1% vs. 2.3%).

CONCLUSION

Group B outcomes were not inferior to group A outcomes, and adverse events did not increase.

© AlphaMed Press; the data published online to support this summary are the property of the authors.

Address: Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Hyogo, Japan.; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.; Department of Surgery, Kawanishi City Hospital, Kawanishi, Japan.; Department of Mathematical Health Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.; Department of Surgery, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Japan.; Department of Surgery, Saiseikai Senri Hospital, Osaka, Japan.; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Osaka, Japan.; Department of Surgery, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan.; Department of Surgery, Rinku General Medical Center, Izumisano Municipal Hospital, Osaka, Japan.; Department of Surgery, Japan Community Health Care Organization Osaka Hospital, Osaka, Japan.; Department of Surgery, Kinki Central Hospital, Hyogo, Japan.; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Hyogo, Japan.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.