Biobehavioral Aspects of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review.

Peter A Hall, Paschal Sheeran, Geoffrey T Fong, Charissa S L Cheah, Mark Oremus, Teresa Liu-Ambrose, Mohammad N Sakib, Zahid A Butt, Hasan Ayaz, Narveen Jandu, Plinio P Morita

Journal: Psychosomatic medicine 2021;83(4):309-321

PMID: 33790201

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This review highlights the scope and significance of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic with a focus on biobehavioral aspects and critical avenues for research.

METHODS

A narrative review of the published research literature was undertaken, highlighting major empirical findings emerging during the first and second waves of the COVID-19 pandemic.

RESULTS

Interactions among biological, behavioral, and societal processes were prominent across all regions of the globe during the first year of the COVID-19 emergency. Affective, cognitive, behavioral, socioeconomic, and technological factors all played a significant role in the spread of infection, response precautions, and outcomes of mitigation efforts. Affective symptoms, suicidality, and cognitive dysfunction have been widely described consequences of the infection, the economic fallout, and the necessary public health mitigation measures themselves. The impact of COVID-19 may be especially serious for those living with severe mental illness and/or chronic medical diseases, given the confluence of several adverse factors in a manner that appears to have syndemic potential.

CONCLUSIONS

The COVID-19 pandemic has made clear that biological and behavioral factors interact with societal processes in the infectious disease context. Empirical research examining mechanistic pathways from infection and recovery to immunological, behavioral, and emotional outcomes is critical. Examination of how emotional and behavioral factors relate to the pandemic-both as causes and as effects-can provide valuable insights that can improve management of the current pandemic and future pandemics to come.

Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Psychosomatic Society.

Address: From the School of Public Health Sciences (Hall, Fong, Oremus, Sakib, Butt, Jandu, Morita) and Department of Psychology (Hall, Fong), University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada; Department of Psychology and Neuroscience (Sheeran), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research (Fong), Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Psychology (Cheah), University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine (Liu-Ambrose), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; School of Biomedical Engineering, Science and Health Systems (Ayaz) and Department of Psychology, College of Arts and Sciences (Ayaz), Drexel University; and Department of Family and Community Health (Ayaz), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.