Impact of Environmental Airborne Manganese Exposure on Cognitive and Motor Functions in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Laura Ruiz-Azcona, Ignacio Fernández-Olmo, Andrea Expósito, Bohdana Markiv, María Paz-Zulueta, Paula Parás-Bravo, Carmen Sarabia-Cobo, Miguel Santibáñez

Journal: International journal of environmental research and public health 2021;18(8):4075

PMID: 33924318

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Whether environmental exposure to Manganese (Mn) in adults is associated with poorer results in cognitive and motor function is unclear. We aimed to determine these associations through a meta-analysis of published studies.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted to identify epidemiological studies on a population ≥18 years old exposed to environmental airborne Mn, and in which results on specific tests to evaluate cognitive or motor functions were reported. We consulted Medline through PubMed, Web of Science and SCOPUS databases. We also performed a manual search within the list of bibliographic references of the retrieved studies and systematic reviews. To weight Mn effects, a random effects versus fixed effect model was chosen after studying the heterogeneity of each outcome.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Among them, eleven studies reported data susceptible for meta-analysis through a pooled correlation or a standardized means difference (SMD) approach between exposed and non-exposed groups. Regarding cognitive function, the results of the studies showed heterogeneity among them (I = 76.49%, < 0.001). The overall effect was a statistically significant negative correlation in the random effects model (pooled r = -0.165; 95%CI: -0.214 to -0.116; < 0.001). For SMD, the results showed a lower heterogeneity with a negative SMD that did not reach statistical significance under the fixed effects model (SMD = -0.052; 95%CI -0.108 to 0.004; = 0.068). Regarding motor function, heterogeneity (I = 75%) was also observed in the correlation approach with a pooled r (random effect model) = -0.150; 95%CI: -0.219 to -0.079; < 0.001. Moderate heterogeneity was observed according to the SMD approach (I = 52.28%), with a pooled SMD = -0.136; 95%CI: -0.188 to-0.084; < 0.001, indicating worse motor function in those exposed.

CONCLUSIONS

Correlation approach results support a negative effect on cognitive and motor functions (the higher the Mn levels, the poorer the scores). Regarding the SMD approach, results also support a worse cognitive and motor functions in those exposed, although only for motor function statistical significance was obtained.

Address: Global Health Research Group, Dpto Enfermería, Universidad de Cantabria, Avda. Valdecilla s/n, 39008 Santander, Cantabria, Spain.; Dpto. de Ingenierías Química y Biomolecular, Universidad de Cantabria, Avda. Los Castros s/n, 39005 Santander, Cantabria, Spain.; Economía de la Salud y Gestión de Servicios Sanitarios Research Group, Dpto Enfermería, Universidad de Cantabria, Avda. Valdecilla s/n, 39008 Santander, Cantabria, Spain.; Research Health and Bioethics Law Group, GRIDES, IDIVAL, Calle Cardenal Herrera Oria s/n, 39011 Santander, Cantabria, Spain.; Cuidados Research Group, Dpto Enfermería, Universidad de Cantabria, Avda. Valdecilla s/n, 39008 Santander, Cantabria, Spain.; Research Nursing Group, IDIVAL, Calle Cardenal Herrera Oria s/n, 39011 Santander, Cantabria, Spain.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.