Probiotic stool secretory immunoglobulin A modulation in children with gastroenteritis: a randomized clinical trial.

Stephen B Freedman, Rachael Horne, Kathene Johnson-Henry, Jianling Xie, Sarah Williamson-Urquhart, Linda Chui, Xiao-Li Pang, Bonita Lee, Suzanne Schuh, Yaron Finkelstein, Serge Gouin, Ken J Farion, Naveen Poonai, Katrina Hurley, David Schnadower, Philip M Sherman

Journal: The American journal of clinical nutrition 2021;113(4):905-914

PMID: 34269370

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We previously conducted the Probiotic Regimen for Outpatient Gastroenteritis Utility of Treatment (PROGUT) study, which identified no improvements in children with acute gastroenteritis (AGE) administered a probiotic. However, the aforementioned study did not evaluate immunomodulatory benefits.

OBJECTIVES

The object of this study was to determine if stool secretory immunoglobulin A (sIgA) concentrations in children with AGE increase more among participants administered a Lactobacillus rhamnosus/helveticus probiotic compared with those administered placebo.

METHODS

This a priori planned multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled ancillary study enrolled children presenting for emergency care who received a 5-d probiotic or placebo course. Participants submitted stool specimens on days 0, 5, and 28. The primary endpoint was the change in stool sIgA concentrations on day 5 compared with baseline.

RESULTS

A total of 133 (n = 66 probiotic, 67 placebo) of 886 PROGUT participants (15.0%) provided all 3 specimens. Median stool sIgA concentrations did not differ between the probiotic and placebo groups at any of the study time points: day 0 median (IQR): 1999 (768, 4071) compared with 2198 (702, 5278) (P = 0.27, Cohen's d = 0.17); day 5: 2505 (1111, 5310) compared with 3207 (982, 7080) (P = 0.19, Cohen's d = 0.16); and day 28: 1377 (697, 2248) compared with 1779 (660, 3977) (P = 0.27, Cohen's d = 0.19), respectively. When comparing measured sIgA concentrations between days 0 and 5, we found no treatment allocation effects [β: -0.24 (-0.65, 0.18); P = 0.26] or interaction between treatment and specimen collection day [β: -0.003 (-0.09, 0.09); P = 0.95]. Although stool sIgA decreased between day 5 and day 28 within both groups (P < 0.001), there were no differences between the probiotic and placebo groups in the median changes in sIgA concentrations when comparing day 0 to day 5 median (IQR) [500 (-1135, 2362) compared with 362 (-1122, 4256); P = 0.77, Cohen's d = 0.075] and day 5 to day 28 [-1035 (-3130, 499) compared with -1260 (-4437, 843); P = 0.70, Cohen's d = 0.067], respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no effect of an L. rhamnosus/helveticus probiotic, relative to placebo, on stool IgA concentrations. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01853124.

© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition.

Address: Sections of Pediatric Emergency Medicine and Gastroenterology, Department of Pediatrics, Alberta Children's Hospital, Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.; Department of Emergency Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.; Cell Biology Program, Research Institute, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.; Section of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Alberta Children's Hospital, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.; Alberta Precision Laboratories - ProvLab, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.; Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, Women and Children's Health Research Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.; Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Paediatrics, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.; Divisions of Emergency Medicine and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Research Institute, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.; Departments of Pediatric Emergency Medicine & Pediatrics, CHU Sainte-Justine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.; Departments of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, and Pediatric Emergency Department, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Departments of Pediatrics, Internal Medicine, Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, Canada.; Division of Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.; Division of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.; Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Paediatrics, and the Cell Biology Program, Research Institute, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.