Clinical practice guidelines for the nutritional risk screening and assessment of cancer patients: a systematic quality appraisal using the AGREE II instrument.

Hong-Juan Zhou, Li-Jin Deng, Tao Wang, Jin-Xiu Chen, Su-Zhen Jiang, Liu Yang, Fang Liu, Mei-Hua Weng, Jing-Wen Hu, Jing-Yu Tan

Journal: Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer 2021;29(6):2885-2893

PMID: 33638747

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the quality of published clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) regarding the nutritional risk screening and assessment of cancer patients and to identify high-quality CPGs for clinical healthcare professionals.

METHODS

Guidelines for the nutritional risk screening and assessment of cancer patients were comprehensively searched in eight electronic databases, including The Lancet, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE), Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Biology Medicine disc (CBMdisc), and Wan Fang Data, through August 2020. Six relevant guideline databases, including the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), the National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC), the Guideline International Network (GIN), the New Zealand Guidelines Group (NZGG), the China Guideline Clearinghouse (CGC), and Medlive, and relevant nutrition society websites, were also searched through August 2020. The methodological quality of the included CPGs was appraised independently by three assessors using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation, 2nd edition (AGREE II) tool.

RESULTS

Seven CPGs were located, and the domain with the highest percentage was "clarity of presentation" (85.44%), while the domain with the lowest percentage was "applicability" (40.26%). From the AGREE II results, two guidelines were rated as "strongly recommended," three were assessed as "recommended with modifications," and two were deemed as "not recommended."

CONCLUSION

Considering that the two "strongly recommended" guidelines were developed within the American and European contexts, translation, validation, and cultural adaptation are recommended prior to implementing these guidelines in other countries or healthcare contexts to improve their effectiveness and sensitivity for local cancer patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration of the study protocol: CRD42020177390 (July 5, 2020).

Address: Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 1 Qiu Yang Road, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.; College of Nursing and Midwifery Brisbane Center, Charles Darwin University, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia.; Rehabilitation Hospital affiliated with Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.; College of Nursing and Midwifery Brisbane Center, Charles Darwin University, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia. [email protected].

Link outs

Free resources

Subscription / membership required

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.