Ali Salehi Farid, Somayeh Niknam, Kheirollah Gholami, Soheil Tavakolpour, Amir Teimourpour, Maryam Daneshpazhooh, Ali Nili, Arghavan Azizpour, Maryam Nasimi, Hamidreza Mahmoudi
Journal: The Journal of dermatological treatment 2022;33(3):1376-1382
PMID: 32875946
BACKGROUND
Actinic keratosis (AK) is a pre-cancerous skin lesion, associated with development of squamous cell carcinoma. Current treatment options are limited.
OBJECTIVES
To compare the efficacy and safety of topical 5-fluorouracil cream (5-FU) and potassium hydroxide 5% (KOH) in the treatment of AK.
METHODS
Eighteen patients with AK applied KOH solution or 5-FU on each side of their scalp/face, randomly. The efficacy and safety of these treatments were compared.
RESULTS
Thirteen (118 lesions) and ten (83 lesions) patients were successfully followed for one and three months, respectively. After one month, KOH showed a better clinical response (81% vs. 58%; -value = 0.007) and dermoscopic response (KOH, 65% vs. 5-FU, 46%; -value = 0.04); while no differences were noted after three months (clinical response, 83% vs.70%, -value = 0.1; dermoscopic response, 76% vs. 59%, -value = 0.1). No significant differences in the recurrence rate of the lesion between the two groups were noted at the end of the third month (-value = 0.5). Regarding the safety of the treatments, the risk of developing erythema, scaling, sand swelling was higher in 5-FU group (-value < 0.0001, for all), while more patients in KOH group had erosion and ulcer (-value < 0.001 for both). KOH was up to 96% less expensive than 5-FU.
LIMITATIONS
Low number of patients and short-term follow-up limited the analysis.
CONCLUSION
KOH solution offers a faster and less expensive resolution of AK lesions than does 5-FU.
CLINICAL TRIAL CODE (IRCT.IR)
IRCT20180909040978N1.
Full Text Sources:
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.