The underestimated issue of non-reproducible cardiac troponin I and T results: case series and systematic review of the literature.

Julien Favresse, Jean-Louis Bayart, Damien Gruson, Sergio Bernardini, Aldo Clerico, Marco Perrone

Journal: Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 2022;59(7):1201-1211

PMID: 33554552

Abstract

Cardiac troponins (cTn) are the preferred biomarkers for the evaluation of myocardial injury and play a key role in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (MI). Pre-analytical or analytical issues and interferences affecting troponin T and I assays are therefore of major concern given the risk of misdiagnosis. False positive troponin results have been related to various interferences including anti-troponin antibodies, heterophilic antibodies, or elevated alkaline phosphatase level. On the other hand, false negative results have been reported in the case of a large biotin intake. These interferences are characterized with erroneous but reproducible troponin results. Of interest, non-reproducible results have also been reported in the literature. In other words, if the sample is reanalyzed a second time, a significant difference in troponin results will be observed. These interferences have been named "fliers" or "outliers". Compared to the biotin interference that received major attention in the literature, troponin outliers are also able to induce harmful clinical consequences for the patient. Moreover, the prevalence of outliers in recent studies was found to be higher (0.28-0.57%) compared to the biotin interference. The aim of this systematic review is to warn clinicians about these non-reproducible results that may alter their clinical judgment. Four case reports that occurred in the Clinique of Saint-Luc Bouge are presented to attest this point. Moreover, we aimed at identifying the nature of these non-reproducible troponin results, determining their occurrence, and describing the best way for their identification.

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.

Address: Department of Laboratory Medicine, Clinique St-Luc Bouge, Namur, Belgium.; Department of Pharmacy, Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences, University of Namur, Namur, Belgium.; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Cliniques Saint-Pierre, Ottignies, Belgium.; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc et Université Catholique de Louvain, Woluwé-Saint-Lambert, Bruxelles, Belgium.; Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Clinical Molecular Biology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.; CNR-Regione Toscana G. Monasterio Foundation, Heart Hospital, Massa, Italy.; Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.; Department of Cardiology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.