Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin in Patients with Mechanical Heart Valves: Open-Label, Proof-of-Concept trial-The RIWA study.

Andre Rodrigues Duraes, Yasmin de Souza Lima Bitar, Igor Santos Schonhofen, Kethyren Santos Oliveira Travassos, Larissa Vitória Pereira, Jose Admirço Lima Filho, Mansueto Gomes Neto, Roque Aras Junior, Leonardo Roever

Journal: American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions 2021;21(3):363-371

PMID: 33150497

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To date, vitamin K antagonists are the only available oral anticoagulants in patients with mechanical heart valves. In this way, we developed a pilot trial with rivaroxaban.

METHODS

 The RIWA study was a proof-of-concept, open-label, randomized clinical trial and was designed to assess the incidence of thromboembolic and bleeding events of the rivaroxaban-based strategy (15 mg twice daily) in comparison to dose-adjusted warfarin. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio and were followed prospectively for 90 days.

RESULTS

 A total of 72 patients were enrolled in the present study. Of these, 44 patients were randomized: 23 patients were allocated to the rivaroxaban group and 21 to the warfarin group. After 90 days of follow-up, the primary outcome occurred in one patient (4.3%) in the rivaroxaban group and three patients (14.3%) in the warfarin group (risk ratio [RR] 0.27; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02-2.85; P = 0.25). Minor bleeding (without discontinuation of medical therapy) occurred in six patients (26.1%) in the rivaroxaban group versus six patients (28.6%) in the warfarin group (RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.23-3.32; P = 0.85). One patient in the warfarin group died from myocardial infarction. No cases of hemorrhagic stroke, valve thrombosis, peripheral embolic events, or new intracardiac thrombus were related in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this pilot study, rivaroxaban 15 mg twice daily had thromboembolic and bleeding events similar to warfarin in patients with mechanical heart valves. These data confirm the authors' proof-of-concept and suggest that a larger trial with a similar design is not unreasonable. CLINICALTRIAL.

GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT03566303.

Address: PPGMS/Federal University of Bahia, UFBA, Bahia, Salvador, Brazil. [email protected].; Medical School, Federal University of Bahia, FAMEB/UFBA, Largo do Terreiro de Jesus, XV de Novembro Square, s/n, Salvador, Bahia, CEP 40026-010, Brazil. [email protected].; Medical School, Federal University of Bahia, FAMEB/UFBA, Largo do Terreiro de Jesus, XV de Novembro Square, s/n, Salvador, Bahia, CEP 40026-010, Brazil.; General Hospital Roberto Santos/SUS-Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.; Bahiana School of Medicine and Public Health, EBMSP, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.; Nursing School, Federal University of Bahia, UFBA, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.; PPGMS/Federal University of Bahia, UFBA, Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.; Federal University of Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.