Feasibility and Acceptability of mHealth Interventions for Managing Hyperphosphatemia in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis.

David E St-Jules, Kathleen Woolf, David S Goldfarb, Mary Lou Pompeii, Huilin Li, Chan Wang, Aditya Mattoo, Zachary A Marcum, Mary Ann Sevick

Journal: Journal of renal nutrition : the official journal of the Council on Renal Nutrition of the National Kidney Foundation 2021;31(4):403-410

PMID: 33160812

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of mobile health (mHealth) phosphorus management programs in hemodialysis (HD) patients.

METHODS

Patients receiving thrice-weekly HD who had 3-month average serum phosphorus of >5.5 mg/dL were randomized to one of the three self-directed phosphorus management programs delivered using tablet PCs: (1) educational videos and handouts (Education), (2) education intervention plus mobile self-monitoring with email feedback (Monitoring), or (3) education and monitoring interventions plus social cognitive theory-based behavioral videos (Combined). Feasibility and acceptability were assessed based on enrollment and retention and training needs (feasibility) and adherence to self-monitoring and reported satisfaction (acceptability).

RESULTS

Of 312 patients, 56 expressed interest, and 40 were enrolled. The majority of participants (80%) completed the 6-month study; none withdrew for intervention-related reasons. The Monitoring and Combined groups received 44 ± 15 minutes of technology training, which was considered adequate by most (75%). Self-monitoring rates were initially high, with 78% and 71% of the participants recording at least one meal and phosphate binder in week 1, respectively, but decreased over time to 15% and 9% in the final week. Most participants reported that self-monitoring helped them stay motivated (64%), track nutrients (80%), and understand how to change diet (76%), and nearly two-thirds of participants (64%) stated that they would like to continue using the tablet PC to manage their health. However, few participants (16%) indicated that self-monitoring was worth the effort. The Monitoring and Combined groups did not differ from the Education group in study outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Although the mHealth programs were generally well received, self-monitoring rates decreased substantially over time and were unaffected by social cognitive theory-based videos. Self-directed mHealth programs may be a useful adjunct to standard care but should be compared to more resource intensive programs (e.g., involving more "live" contact with a dietitian) to determine overall cost-effectiveness and role in HD care.

Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Address: Department of Population Health, Center for Healthful Behavior Change, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY.; Department of Nutrition and Food Studies, New York University Steinhardt, New York, NY.; Division of Nephrology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY.; Division of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY.; Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.; Department of Population Health, Center for Healthful Behavior Change, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY; Division of Endocrinology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY. Electronic address: [email protected].
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.