Equal efficacy of gastric and jejunal tube feeding in liver cirrhosis and/or alcoholic hepatitis: a randomised controlled study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Malnutrition and muscle mass loss are complications in liver cirrhosis and alcoholic hepatitis (AH). Hospitalised patients who do not meet nutritional requirements are recommended to be fed enterally or parenterally, but no guidelines recommend a specific type of tube. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of jejunal versus gastric feeding.

METHOD

40 inpatients with liver cirrhosis and/or AH, a nutritional risk score more than 2 and a reduced daily energy intake were included. Half were randomised to nasogastric (NG) and half to nasojejunal (NJ) tube feeding. All received Peptamen AF as a supplement to oral intake. Participants were followed up until discharge or death.

FINDINGS

The study evaluated the data for 33 patients for 7 days after tube insertion. Mean daily energy intake for 7 days was 6509 kJ (NG) vs 6605kJ (NJ) (=0.90). Tubes accidently removed by patients: once (=16); twice (=9); three times (=6), with no differences between NG and NJ.

CONCLUSION

There were no significant differences in total nutritional intake between early NG feeding and early NJ feeding 7 days after tube insertion. The number of tube replacements was similar in both groups. Choice of tubes for patients with severe liver disease will depend on individual patient characteristics and needs and local facilities.