Inter-individual variability in atrasentan exposure partly explains variability in kidney protection and fluid retention responses: A post hoc analysis of the SONAR trial.

Jeroen V Koomen, Jasper Stevens, George Bakris, Ricardo Correa-Rotter, Fan Fan Hou, Dalane W Kitzman, Donald Kohan, Hirofumi Makino, John J V McMurray, Hans-Henrik Parving, Vlado Perkovic, Sheldon W Tobe, Dick de Zeeuw, Hiddo J L Heerspink

Journal: Diabetes, obesity & metabolism 2021;23(2):561-568

PMID: 33184931

Abstract

AIM

To evaluate whether atrasentan plasma exposure explains between-patient variability in urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) response, a surrogate for kidney protection, and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) response, a surrogate for fluid expansion.

METHODS

Type 2 diabetic patients with chronic kidney disease (n = 4775) received 0.75 mg atrasentan for 6 weeks in the active run-in period. Individual area under the concentration-time-curve (AUC) was estimated using a population pharmacokinetic model. The association between atrasentan AUC, other clinical characteristics, and UACR and BNP response, was estimated using linear regression.

RESULTS

The median atrasentan AUC was 43.8 ng.h/mL with a large variation among patients (2.5th-97.5th percentiles [P]: 12.6 to 197.5 ng.h/mL). Median UACR change at the end of enrichment was -36.0% and median BNP change was 8.7%, which also varied among patients (UACR, 2.5th-97.5th P: -76.2% to 44.5%; BNP, 2.5th-97.5th P: -71.5% to 300.0%). In the multivariable analysis, higher atrasentan AUC was associated with greater UACR reduction (4.88% per doubling in ng.h/mL [95% confidence interval {CI}: 6.21% to 3.52%], P < .01) and greater BNP increase (3.08% per doubling in ng.h/mL [95% CI: 1.12% to 4.11%], P < .01) independent of estimated glomerular filtration rate, haemoglobin or BNP. Caucasian patients compared with black patients had greater UACR reduction (7.06% [95% CI: 1.38% to 13.07%]) and also greater BNP increase (8.75% [95% CI: 1.65% to 15.35%]). UACR response was not associated with BNP response (r = 0.06).

CONCLUSION

Atrasentan plasma exposure varied among individual patients and partially explained between-patient variability in efficacy and safety response.

© 2020 The Authors. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Address: Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.; American Society of Hypertension Comprehensive Hypertension Center, University of Chicago Medicine and Biological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois.; National Medical Science and Nutrition Institute Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.; Division of Nephrology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Kidney Disease, Guangzhou, China.; Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.; Division of Nephrology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah.; Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.; British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.; Department of Medical Endocrinology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.; Faculty of Health Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.; George Institute for Global Health and University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.; Division of Nephrology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto and the Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.