Xiu-Mei Guo, Xia Zhai, Bo-Ru Hou
Journal: Australian journal of primary health 2021;26(6):458-465
PMID: 33296622
This study evaluated the role of health literacy (HL) in the self-management of diabetes. A literature search was conducted in electronic databases and studies were selected using precise eligibility criteria. A meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the HL adequacy rate, factors affecting the adequacy of HL and correlations between HL and diabetes self-management variables. Thirty-three studies were included in the analysis. The HL adequacy rate was 67% (95% confidence interval (CI) 57, 76). Compared with patients with inadequate HL, patients with adequate HL were younger (mean difference -5.2 years; 95% CI -7.2, -3.2; P<0.00001), more likely to have a high school or higher level of education (odds ratio (OR) 8.39; 95% CI 5.03, 13.99]; P<0.00001) and were less likely to belong to a low-income group (OR 0.36; 95% CI 0.23, 0.56; P<0.00001). HL was positively correlated with self-monitoring (r=0.19; 95% CI 0.11, 0.27; P<0.00001), dietary and physical care (r=0.12; 95% CI 0.07, 0.18; P=0.009), diabetes knowledge (r=0.29; 95% CI 0.09, 0.45; P<0.001), self-efficacy (r=0.28; 95% CI 0.15, 0.41; P<0.00001), self-care (0.24; 95% CI 0.16, 0.31; P<0.00001), formal education (r=0.35; 95% CI 0.18, 0.53; P<0.00001) and social support (r=0.2; 95% CI 0.07, 0.33; P<0.00001). Patient age (r=-0.28; 95% CI -0.39, -0.17; P<0.00001) was inversely correlated with HL. In conclusion, 67% of diabetes patients had adequate HL, with a higher rate among better educated and higher income groups. HL had a statistically significant but weak positive correlation with diabetes self-management variables.
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.