Efficacy and Safety of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Previously Treated With Sorafenib: The CheckMate 040 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Thomas Yau, Yoon-Koo Kang, Tae-You Kim, Anthony B El-Khoueiry, Armando Santoro, Bruno Sangro, Ignacio Melero, Masatoshi Kudo, Ming-Mo Hou, Ana Matilla, Francesco Tovoli, Jennifer J Knox, Aiwu Ruth He, Bassel F El-Rayes, Mirelis Acosta-Rivera, Ho-Yeong Lim, Jaclyn Neely, Yun Shen, Tami Wisniewski, Jeffrey Anderson, Chiun Hsu

Journal: JAMA oncology 2022;6(11):e204564

PMID: 33001135

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Most patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are diagnosed with advanced disease not eligible for potentially curative therapies; therefore, new treatment options are needed. Combining nivolumab with ipilimumab may improve clinical outcomes compared with nivolumab monotherapy.

OBJECTIVE

To assess efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced HCC who were previously treated with sorafenib.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

CheckMate 040 is a multicenter, open-label, multicohort, phase 1/2 study. In the nivolumab plus ipilimumab cohort, patients were randomized between January 4 and September 26, 2016. Treatment group information was blinded after randomization. Median follow-up was 30.7 months. Data cutoff for this analysis was January 2019. Patients were recruited at 31 centers in 10 countries/territories in Asia, Europe, and North America. Eligible patients had advanced HCC (with/without hepatitis B or C) previously treated with sorafenib. A total of 148 patients were randomized (50 to arm A and 49 each to arms B and C).

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to either nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg, administered every 3 weeks (4 doses), followed by nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks (arm A); nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg, administered every 3 weeks (4 doses), followed by nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks (arm B); or nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks (arm C).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Coprimary end points were safety, tolerability, and objective response rate. Duration of response was also measured (investigator assessed with the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1).

RESULTS

Of 148 total participants, 120 were male (81%). Median (IQR) age was 60 (52.5-66.5). At data cutoff (January 2019), the median follow-up was 30.7 months (IQR, 29.9-34.7). Investigator-assessed objective response rate was 32% (95% CI, 20%-47%) in arm A, 27% (95% CI, 15%-41%) in arm B, and 29% (95% CI, 17%-43%) in arm C. Median (range) duration of response was not reached (8.3-33.7+) in arm A and was 15.2 months (4.2-29.9+) in arm B and 21.7 months (2.8-32.7+) in arm C. Any-grade treatment-related adverse events were reported in 46 of 49 patients (94%) in arm A, 35 of 49 patients (71%) in arm B, and 38 of 48 patients (79%) in arm C; there was 1 treatment-related death (arm A; grade 5 pneumonitis).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this randomized clinical trial, nivolumab plus ipilimumab had manageable safety, promising objective response rate, and durable responses. The arm A regimen (4 doses nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks then nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks) received accelerated approval in the US based on the results of this study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01658878.

Address: Department of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.; Asan Medical Center, Department of Oncology, University of Ulsan, Seoul, South Korea.; Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.; Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of Medical Oncology/Hematology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.; Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Humanitas Cancer Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.; Department of Internal Medicine, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra, and Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red de Enfermedades Hepaticas y Digestivas, Pamplona, Spain.; Department of Immunology and Immunotherapy, Clinica Universidad de Navarra and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, Pamplona, Spain.; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.; Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.; Department of Medicine, Servicio de Digestivo, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red de Enfermedades Hepaticas y Digestivas, Madrid, Spain.; Department of Medical & Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.; Cancer Clinical Research Unit, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.; Division of Hematology/Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC.; Department of Hematology, Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia.; Department of Hematology and Oncology, Fundacion de Investigacion, San Juan, Puerto Rico.; Samsung Medical Center, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.; Department of Immuno-Oncology, Biomarkers, and Translational Medicine, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey.; Department of Immuno-Oncology, Oncology, and Immunology, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey.; Department of Clinical Research, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey.; Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.