Environmental cleaning to prevent COVID-19 infection. A rapid systematic review.

Patrícia Mitsue Saruhashi Shimabukuro, Márcio Luís Duarte, Aline Mizusaki Imoto, Álvaro Nagib Atallah, Eduardo Signorini Bicas Franco, Maria Stella Peccin, Mônica Taminato

Journal: Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina 2020;138(6):505-514

PMID: 33206913

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Faced with a pandemic, all healthcare actions need to reflect best practices, in order to avoid high transmissibility, complications and even hospitalizations. For hospital environments, the products recommended and authorized by regulatory institutions for environmental cleaning and disinfection need to be highly effective.

OBJECTIVE

To identify, systematically evaluate and summarize the best available scientific evidence on environmental cleaning to prevent COVID-19 infection.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A systematic review of studies analyzing cleaning products that inactivate coronavirus, conducted within the evidence-based health program of a federal university in São Paulo (SP), Brazil.

METHODS

A systematic search of the relevant literature was conducted in the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL and LILACS databases, for articles published up to May 27, 2020, relating to studies evaluating cleaning products that inactivate coronavirus in the environment.

RESULTS

Seven studies were selected. These analyzed use of 70% alcohol, detergent, detergent containing iodine, household bleach, sodium hypochlorite, hydrogen peroxide, chlorine dioxide, glutaraldehyde, ultraviolet irradiation and plasma air purifier. The effectiveness of treating sewage with sodium hypochlorite and chlorine dioxide was also evaluated.

CONCLUSION

Disinfection of environments, especially those in ordinary use, such as bathrooms, needs to be done constantly. Viral inactivation was achieved using chlorine-based disinfectants, alcohol, detergents, glutaraldehyde, iodine-containing detergents, hydrogen peroxide compounds and household bleaches. Alcohol showed efficient immediate activity. In sewage, sodium hypochlorite had better action than chlorine dioxide.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/YC5P4 in the Open Science Framework.

Address: Nurse, Hospital Sancta Maggiore São Paulo, São Paulo (SP), Brazil; Master's Student, Master's Program, Escola Paulista de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo (UNIFESP), Sao Paulo (SP), Brazil.; MD, MSc. Musculoskeletal Radiologist, Webimagem, São Paulo (SP), Brazil; Evidence-Based Health Program, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo (SP), Brazil.; PT, PhD. Professor, Professional and Academic Master's Program in Health Sciences, Evidence-Based Health Laboratory, Escola Superior de Ciências da Saúde (ESCS), São Paulo (SP), Brazil.; MD, PhD. Head of Department of Evidence-Based Health, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo (SP), Brazil.; PT, MSc. Doctoral student, Department of Evidence-Based Health, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo (SP), Brazil.; PT, PhD. Associate Professor, Department of Human Movement Sciences, and Advisor of Evidence-Based Health Program, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo (SP), Brazil.; PhD. Nurse, Escola Paulista de Enfermagem (EPE), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.