Pravej Serichetaphongse, Wareeratn Chengprapakorn, Sirikarn Thongmeearkom, Atiphan Pimkhaokham
Journal: Clinical implant dentistry and related research 2020;22(5):638-646
PMID: 32902102
BACKGROUND
Soft tissue reaction to dental implant abutments influences the sustainability of restoration. Several abutment materials, such as titanium and gold alloy, have been introduced for strength and esthetic solutions. Zirconia and titanium-base abutments have also become popular in recent years due to high esthetic demands.
PURPOSE
To investigate the immune cell infiltration into the soft tissue in response to different abutment materials.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Twenty dental implants were placed in the posterior regions of 17 patients. Titanium, zirconia, gold alloy, and titanium-base were randomly selected for each patient on the day of surgery. After 8 weeks of healing, the abutments were removed along with 1 mm of peri-implant soft tissue. Immunohistochemical assessment was performed using labeled streptavidin-biotin to identify T cells, B cells, macrophages, plasma cells, and microvascular infiltration.
RESULTS
Gold alloy demonstrated an overall higher inflammatory cell infiltration and highest number of CD3 , CD20 , and CD 68 cells (P value <.05). The number of plasma cell and new microvascular infiltrations among abutment materials was not significantly different.
CONCLUSION
Titanium, titanium-base, and zirconia abutments showed comparable infiltration profiles; gold alloy abutments showed the highest B-cell, T cell, and macrophage infiltration. None of the abutment materials caused clinical inflammation; hence, they can be effectively used.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.