Efficacy and Safety of ABP 798: Results from the JASMINE Trial in Patients with Follicular Lymphoma in Comparison with Rituximab Reference Product.

Dietger Niederwieser, Caroline Hamm, Patrick Cobb, Mindy Mo, Cecily Forsyth, Alessandra Tucci, Vladimir Hanes, Vincent Delwail, Roman Hajek, David Chien

Journal: Targeted oncology 2021;15(5):599-611

PMID: 33044684

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

ABP 798 is being developed as a biosimilar to rituximab reference product (RP), a CD20-directed cytolytic antibody that is approved in the US and EU for the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).

METHODS

This randomized, double-blind, comparative clinical study (JASMINE) evaluated the efficacy and safety of ABP 798 compared with rituximab RP. Adult, anti-CD20 treatment naïve patients diagnosed with grade 1, 2, or 3a follicular B-cell NHL expressing CD20 were randomized 1:1 to receive a 375 mg/m infusion of either ABP 798 or rituximab RP once weekly for 4 weeks and at weeks 12 and 20. Tumor assessments were performed at baseline and weeks 12 and 28. Primary endpoint was the risk difference (RD) of overall response rate (ORR) of complete response, unconfirmed complete response, or partial response by week 28 based on data from central, independent, and blinded assessments of disease.

RESULTS

Of the 256 randomized patients, 254 were treated with ABP 798 (n = 128; 100%) or rituximab RP (n = 126; 98.4%); 96 (78.0%) patients in the ABP 798 group and 87 (70.2%) in the rituximab RP group had a best ORR by week 28. The point estimate of RD in ORR between ABP 798 and rituximab RP from the adjusted generalized linear model for stratification factors was 7.7%. Clinical equivalence was based on sequential testing of the one-sided 95% lower confidence limits and one-sided 95% upper confidence limits of RD in ORR (- 1.4% and 16.8%, respectively) which was within the prespecified non-inferiority margin (- 15%) and non-superiority margin (35.5%), respectively. Results of sensitivity analyses were consistent with the primary efficacy analysis. ABP 798 was also comparable to rituximab RP across additional secondary endpoints, further supporting the conclusion of similarity, and including: RD of ORR at week 12; trough serum concentrations; percent of patients with complete depletion of CD19+ cell count at day 8; safety; and immunogenicity.

CONCLUSIONS

These results support a conclusion of similar clinical efficacy between ABP 798 and rituximab RP in patients with follicular lymphoma.

NCT NUMBER

NCT02747043; first posted April 21, 2016.

EUDRACT NUMBER

2013-005,542-11; submitted 14 October, 2014.

Address: Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Leipzig, Liebigstr. 19, 04106, Leipzig, Germany. [email protected].; Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania. [email protected].; School of Medicine, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Aichi/Nagoya, Japan. [email protected].; Schulich School of Medicine, Western University, Windsor, ON, Canada.; St. Vincent Frontier Cancer Center, Billings, MT, USA.; Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.; Gosford Hospital, Gosford, NSW, Australia.; Hematology Department, ASST-Spedali Civili-Brescia, Brescia, Italy.; Oncology-Hematology and Cell Therapy, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.; Department of Hematooncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Ostrava, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.