Longitudinal Effects of Active Learning Education on Lifestyle Behavior and Physical Function in Older Adults.

Minoru Yamada, Hiroshi Okamoto, Kazuki Uemura, Tsukasa Kamitani

Journal: Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 2021;22(2):459-463

PMID: 32631801

Abstract

[{"label":"OBJECTIVES","text":"Sustaining benefits of an exercise program is difficult as adherence is often poor after supervised intervention is over. This study aimed to determine whether the effects of active learning education on physical activity, dietary habits, and physical function were maintained 24\u00a0weeks after intervention termination in older adults."},{"label":"DESIGN","text":"Non-randomized controlled trial."},{"label":"SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS","text":"Community-dwelling older adults aged \u226565\u00a0years who were independent in activities of daily living."},{"label":"METHODS","text":"The intervention group (n\u00a0=\u00a036) underwent 24\u00a0weeks of active learning education. The control group (n\u00a0=\u00a059) attended a health education class didactically. In both groups, the education program focused on exercise, diet and nutrition, and cognitive activity for health promotion. Active learning included exploratory learning, group work, and self-planning for behavior change that promoted healthy lifestyles. Outcome measures were obtained at baseline (pre), 24\u00a0weeks (post), and 48\u00a0weeks (follow-up). Physical activity was objectively measured as physical activity level (PAL) using a triaxial accelerometer. Food intake was assessed by obtaining a dietary variety score. Physical function, including gait speed and Timed Up & Go score, was tested as secondary outcome. We used a linear mixed model to estimate the effects of intervention in intention-to-treat analyses."},{"label":"RESULTS","text":"All outcomes in the intervention group significantly improved compared with the control group at 24\u00a0weeks, and the improvements were sustained over a 48-week follow-up period. For PAL, between-group difference in change from baseline was 0.043 (95% confidence interval\u00a0=\u00a00.007, 0.080) at 24\u00a0weeks and 0.061 (0.023, 0.099) at 48\u00a0weeks."},{"label":"CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS","text":"Active learning education is effective in enhancing healthy lifestyles and physical function sustainability beyond intervention cessation. A randomized controlled trial with a larger sample size is needed to conclusively clarify the beneficial effects of active health education learning on sustainable behavior change and functional improvement."},{"copyright":"Copyright \u00a9 2020 AMDA \u2013 The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved."}]
Address: Center for Liberal Arts and Sciences, Faculty of Engineering, Toyama Prefectural University, Imizu, Japan. Electronic address: [email protected].; Department of Healthcare Epidemiology, School of Public Health in the Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.; Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tokyo, Japan.; Center for Liberal Arts and Sciences, Faculty of Engineering, Toyama Prefectural University, Imizu, Japan.

Link outs

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.