The Titanium-coated PEEK Cage Maintains Better Bone Fusion With the Endplate Than the PEEK Cage 6 Months After PLIF Surgery: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Study.

Tomohiko Hasegawa, Hiroki Ushirozako, Ebata Shigeto, Tetsuro Ohba, Hiroki Oba, Keijiro Mukaiyama, Satoshi Shimizu, Yu Yamato, Koichiro Ide, Yosuke Shibata, Toshiyuki Ojima, Jun Takahashi, Hirotaka Haro, Yukihiro Matsuyama

Journal: Spine 2020;45(15):E892-E902

PMID: 32675599

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

A multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group trial.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate interbody bone fusion rates in titanium-coated polyetheretherketone (TiPEEK) and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Previous clinical studies have not revealed any significant difference in bone fusion rates between TiPEEK and PEEK cages.

METHODS

During one-level PLIF surgery, 149 patients (84 men, 65 women, mean age 67 yr) were randomly allocated to use either a TiPEEK cage (n = 69) or PEEK cage (n = 80). Blinded radiographic evaluations were performed using computed tomography and assessed by modified intention-to-treat analysis in 149 cases and per-protocol analysis in 143 cases who were followed for 12 months. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Index.

RESULTS

The interbody union rate at 12 months after surgery was 45% owing to a very strict definition of bone fusion. The rates of bone fusion were significantly higher at 4 and 6 months after surgery in the TiPEEK group than in the PEEK group in the unadjusted modified intention-to-treat analysis and were significantly higher at 6 months in the unadjusted per-protocol analysis. Binary logistic regression analysis adjusted for sex, age, body mass index, bone mineral density, and surgical level showed that using a TiPEEK cage (odds ratio, 2.27; 95% confidence interval: 1.09-4.74; P = 0.03) was independently associated with bone fusion at 6 months after surgery. Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire and Oswestry Disability Index results improved postoperatively in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Using the TiPEEK cage for PLIF enabled the maintenance of better bone fusion to the endplate than using the PEEK cage at 6 months after the surgery. Our findings suggest the possibility of an earlier return to rigorous work or sports by the use of TiPEEK cage.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1.

Address: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan.; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan.; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, North Alps Medical Center Azumi Hospital, Kita Azumi, Nagano, Japan.; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Narita Memorial Hospital, Aichi, Japan.; Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Division of Geriatric Musculoskeletal Health, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.; Department of Community Health and Preventive Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.