Is vaginal flatus related to pelvic floor functional anatomy?

Hedwig Neels, Stefaan Pacquée, Ka-Lai Shek, Moshe Gillor, Jessica Caudwell-Hall, Hans Peter Dietz

Journal: International urogynecology journal 2021;31(12):2551-2555

PMID: 32529562

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Vaginal flatus is an embarrassing condition that can impair women's quality of life. The underlying pathophysiology is unclear. We aimed to evaluate the association between vaginal flatus and pelvic floor anatomy.

METHODS

Retrospective observational study on women seen in a tertiary urogynaecological service. All had undergone a standardised interview, clinical examination and four-dimensional transperineal ultrasound. Offline analysis of volume data was performed blinded against clinical data.

RESULTS

Datasets of 570 women were analysed. Five hundred twelve (90%) were vaginally parous. Vaginal flatus was reported by 190 (33%). Mean bother score was 4.2 (SD 3.4, range 0-10). One hundred eighty-five reported frequency of vaginal flatus: it occurred < once a month in 25 (14%), once a month in 70 (38%), once a week in 47 (25%), once daily in 28 (15%) and > once daily in 15 (8%). One hundred two women identified the following precipitating factors: intercourse in 72 (71%), postural change in 22 (22%) and physical activities in 9 (9%). Vaginal birth, central and posterior compartment prolapse, anal incontinence, higher levator resting tone and younger age were associated with vaginal flatus. The latter was moderately correlated with symptom bother (correlation coefficient - 0.21).

CONCLUSIONS

Vaginal flatus is a prevalent and bothersome condition affecting one-third of our study population. The condition is associated with pelvic floor functional anatomy. A higher resting tone may confer a higher resistance against which trapped air is expelled during physical activities. Younger age was moderately correlated with symptom bother.

Address: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, MOVANT, University of Antwerp, Campus Drie Eiken-Lokaal R3.10-Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium. [email protected].; Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium. [email protected].; Sydney Medical School Nepean, University of Sydney, Penrith, Australia.; Western Sydney University, Penrith, Australia.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.