Diagnostic accuracy of serum (1-3)-β-D-glucan for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Olivier Del Corpo, Guillaume Butler-Laporte, Donald C Sheppard, Matthew P Cheng, Emily G McDonald, Todd C Lee

Journal: Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 2021;26(9):1137-1143

PMID: 32479781

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) can be a life-threatening opportunistic infection in immunocompromised hosts. The diagnosis can be challenging, often requiring semi-invasive respiratory sampling. The serum 1,3-β-D-glucan (BDG) assay has been proposed as a minimally invasive test for the presumptive diagnosis of PJP.

METHOD

We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis using articles in the English language published between January 1960 and September 2019. We estimated the pooled sensitivity and specificity of BDG testing using a bivariate random effects approach and compared test performance in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and non-HIV subgroups with meta-regression. Data from the pooled sensitivity and specificity were transformed to generate pre- and post-test probability curves.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of serum BDG testing for PJP were 91% (95%CI 87-94%) and 79% (95%CI 72-84%) respectively. The sensitivity in patients with HIV was better than in patients without (94%, 95%CI 91-96%) versus 86% (95%CI 78-91%) (p 0.02), with comparable specificity (83%, 95%CI 69-92% versus 83%, 95%CI 72-90%) (p 0.10). A negative BDG was only associated with a low post-test probability of PJP (≤5%) when the pre-test probability was low to intermediate (≤20% in non-HIV and ≤50% in HIV).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with a higher likelihood of PJP, the pooled sensitivity of BDG is insufficient to exclude infection. Similarly, for most cases, the pooled specificity is inadequate to diagnose PJP. Understanding the performance of BDG in the population being investigated is therefore essential to optimal clinical decision-making.

Copyright © 2020 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Address: Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada.; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada; McGill Interdisciplinary Initiative in Infection and Immunity, Montréal, Canada; Department of Microbiology & Immunology, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada; McGill Interdisciplinary Initiative in Infection and Immunity, Montréal, Canada.; McGill Interdisciplinary Initiative in Infection and Immunity, Montréal, Canada; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Clinical Practice Assessment Unit, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada.; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada; McGill Interdisciplinary Initiative in Infection and Immunity, Montréal, Canada; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Clinical Practice Assessment Unit, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada. Electronic address: [email protected].

Link outs

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.