Takuma Higurashi, Atsushi Nakajima, Yasushi Ichikawa, Satoru Saito, Noritoshi Kobayashi, Hiroto Ishiki, Takeharu Yamanaka, Masataka Taguri, Masato Yoneda, Anna Ozaki, Kento Imajo, Yuji Ogawa, Yasushi Honda, Takayuki Kato, Tsutomu Yoshihara, Takashi Kobayashi, Michihiro Iwaki, Takaomi Kessoku
Journal: Trials 2021;21(1):453
PMID: 32487150
BACKGROUND
Patients taking opioids are known to develop opioid-induced constipation (OIC), which reduces their quality of life. The aim of this study is to compare magnesium oxide with naldemedine and determine which is more effective in preventing OIC.
METHODS
This proof-of-concept, prospective, randomized controlled trial commenced in Japan in March 2018. Initially, a questionnaire-based survey will be conducted targeting adult patients with cancer who concomitantly commenced opioid treatment and OIC prevention treatment. Patients will then be randomly allocated to a magnesium oxide group (500 mg thrice daily) or a naldemedine group (0.2 mg once daily). Each drug will be orally administered for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint is defined as any improvement in scores on the Japanese version of Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life questionnaire (JPAC-QOL) from baseline to 2 weeks of treatment.
DISCUSSION
The primary endpoint is change in JPAC-QOL score from baseline to 2 weeks of intervention. The key secondary endpoint will be change in spontaneous bowel movements at 2 and 12 weeks of intervention. This study will determine whether magnesium oxide or naldemedine is more effective for the prevention of OIC.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000031891. Registered March 25, 2018.
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.